Read This and Weep: Dennis Kucinich on Iraq Invasion and Lies as Weapons of Mass Destruction

Venezuela is breached, and Cuba, Iran, and others are in the sights of the US government. Dennis Kucinich’s article from 2023 and the upcoming anniversary of the US invasion of Iraq are alarms that urgently need to be sounded over and over again.

IRAQ PLUS 20 – Lies as Weapons of Mass Destruction

Part One: The Script for the Lead-Up to War

Dennis Kucinich
March 15, 2023

Twenty years ago this month, America was led into a $5 trillion war.  It cost the lives of more than a million Iraqis and thousands of U.S. soldiers. The Iraq War was based on the transparent lies of leaders whose judgment was hijacked by neoconservative ideologues.  The neocons see America as the center of the universe, from which we must rule the world and seize its resources.  When that is one’s starting point, diplomacy is archaic.  

Events after 9/11 were deliberately twisted by the mad martinets of the Project for the New American Century, those monomaniacal specimens locked in the amber of a Post WWII, unipolar era.   

It was those same neocons who impressed upon us their preconceived but instrumental narrative that Iraq’s Saddam Hussein (who had nothing to do with 9/11) was the great evil in the world, requiring he and his nation be destroyed. 

Once accomplished, the neocons leapt over the wreckage they have created.  On to the next conjured enemy. Empire, always empire:  Bleed Russia, using the brave Ukrainians as a pawn, then pivot to China, war in no less than three years!

The western media, with few exceptions (Pentagon Papers and Watergate), have been dutiful spear-carriers for the U.S. government.  Those who raised questions about the perilous path in Iraq 20 years ago were condemned as useful idiots, censored and cancelled.  It is happening again, this time with the lock-step march toward war with China.  Ukraine is being sold out.  It has never been about freedom.  It has been about controlling an energy market.

Post-hoc analysis of war is always painful.  “If I only knew then what I know now, I would not have supported the war,” is a favorite apologia of some of the more stalwart supporters of invading Iraq.  I was a member of the United States Congress from 1997-2013.   Over a period of a dozen years, I delivered at least 341 speeches on the floor of the House in opposition to the Iraq war, which I saw as a criminal misuse of power.  I knew then and I know now. 

Just as we ignored diplomacy in Iraq, America has refused diplomacy that could have prevented bloodshed in Ukraine, choosing instead to pursue a geopolitical fantasy of deposing Putin with the help of Europe. 

The U.S. is escalating with Russia at this writing, as a U.S. drone and a  Russian fighter jet collided above the Black Sea. The U.S. has been practicing missile launches in the direction of St. Petersburg, sending B-52s over the Baltics towards Russia.  Simultaneously the U.S. ratchets up aggression against China, as we threaten to make Taiwan our next Ukraine.

Iraq stands as an important tale of U.S. government arrogance, deception and depravity and the increased danger when there is a media buy-in. The cavalcade of Iraq chaos recited in the timeline below, demonstrates that the perils of prevarication are extreme and the consequences earth shattering. 

Please tell me it can’t happen again…!

Twenty years ago, America descended into war, pronouncement by pronouncement. Read the words below, and the certainty with which those who took us to war expressed themselves as they led us blindly into a maelstrom of deceit and mass murder rocking the cradle of civilization.  Tell me it can’t happen again. 

In the days following the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, as intelligence agencies stumbled and dissembled in often chaotic private briefings with members of Congress, I heard rumors around Capitol Hill that Iraq was going to be made to pay the price for the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.  Iraq?  What did Iraq have to do with 9/11? Nothing. But it had everything to do with dying embers of a unipolar world.

Through the following year, the highest U.S. administrative officials made concerted efforts to conflate Iraq with 9/11 and to make claims that were unsubstantiated or and even rejected by intelligence agencies.   

This timeline and quotes are by no means complete. But they are characteristic of the much-publicized accusations made against Iraq that led to the March 19, 2003 United States attack on that nation and its people.

Read this and weep, not just for the Iraqi people,
but for our own children and grandchildren:

1/29/02: [States such as Iraq, Iran and North Korea] “and their terrorist allies constitute an Axis of Evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world, by seeking weapons of mass destruction. These regimes pose a grave and growing danger.” –President Bush, State of the Union address.

2/2/02:  “His [Saddam Hussein’s] regime has had high-level contacts with al Qaeda going back a decade and has provided training to al Qaeda terrorists.” — Vice President Cheney, Speech to Air National Guard Senior Leadership.

3/17/02:  “We know they [Iraqis] have biological and chemical weapons.”  — Vice President Cheney, Press Conference with Crown Prince of Bahrain.

3/19/02:  “…and we know they are pursuing nuclear weapons.” — Vice President Cheney, Press Briefing with Israeli Prime Minister Sharon in Israel.

3/24/02:  “He [Hussein] is actively pursuing nuclear weapons at this time…”  — Vice President Cheney, CNN Late Edition.

3/24/02: “The notion of a Saddam Hussein with his great oil wealth, with his inventory that he already has of biological and chemical weapons… is I think, a frightening proposition for anybody who thinks about it.” — Vice President Cheney on CBS’ Face the Nation.

5/19/02:  “We know he’s got chemicals and biological (sic) and we know he’s working on nuclear.”  — Vice President Cheney, NBC’s Meet the Press.

8/26/02:  “We know that Saddam has resumed his efforts to acquire nuclear weapons…Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction.  He is amassing them to use against our friends, our enemies and against us.” — Vice President Cheney to the VFW 103rd Convention.

9/8/02:  “We know he has the infrastructure, nuclear scientists to make a nuclear weapon… The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons.  But we don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.” — President Bush’s National Security Adviser, Dr. Condoleeza Rice.  CNN with Wolf Blitzer.

9/8/02:  “…he [Saddam Hussein] has indeed stepped up his capacity to produce and deliver biological weapons, that he has reconstituted his nuclear program to develop a nuclear weapon, that there are efforts under way inside Iraq to significantly expand his capability.”  — Vice President Cheney, NBC Meet the Press.

9/8/02:  “He is, in fact, actively and aggressively seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.” — Vice President Cheney, NBC Meet the Press.

9/12/02:  “Saddam Hussein’s regime is a grave and gathering danger. To suggest otherwise is to hope against the evidence.”  — President Bush to UN General Assembly.

9/16/02: “Iraq continues to defy us and the world, we will move deliberately, yet decisively, to hold Iraq to account….”  — President Bush, speech in Iowa.

9/19/02:  No “terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people than the regime of Saddam Hussein and Iraq.” — Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Statement to Congress.

9/28/02: “We’ve learned that Iraq has trained al Queda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases.” –President Bush, Weekly Radio Address to the Nation.

10/2/02:  “The regime has the scientists and facilities to build nuclear weapons, and is seeking the materials needed to do so.”  — President Bush from the White House.

10/5/02:  “In defiance of the United Nations, Iraq has stockpiled biological and chemical weapons, and is rebuilding the facilities used to make more of those weapons.” — President Bush speech.

Early on October 2, 2002,  President Bush, surrounded by leaders of both political parties, including Democratic Leader Richard Gephardt, a future presidential candidate,  announced White House-prepared legislation to be brought to Congress entitled “Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.” (Also known as the Iraq War resolution.)

When I first read the text of the Iraq War Resolution, I was incredulous.

So, this was the factual narrative the White House intended to pursue to attempt to persuade Congress to authorize a military attack on Iraq?

I immediately went to work, dissecting the claims made in the war resolution, quickly reviewing massive notebooks I had prepared since 9/11, jammed with internal congressional reports, private notes written after intelligence briefings, media accounts, and even reports from Iraq arms inspectors.  I saw no evidence from the National Intelligence Estimate, the Central Intelligence Agency or the Defense Intelligence Agency that Iraq posed the kind of threat the Bush Administration was projecting.

The truth was, no matter what the Bush Administration and Congressional leaders said, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.  Iraq had nothing to do with al Qaeda’s role.  Iraq did not have the intention to attack the United States.  Iraq, with a military budget about 1% of the U.S. Pentagon expenditures, did not have the capability to attack our nation.  Most significantly, it was fairly easy to determine that there was absolutely no proof that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and, as such, was not preparing to use them against our nation. 

I wrote a report on my congressional letterhead categorically discounting the Iraq Resolution’s cause of war, and, on October 2, 2002, I went to the floor of the House of Representatives and, through the next week, personally placed my analysis in the hands of  about 250 members of the House, of both the Democrat and Republican parties, with a request that it be read before the vote. 

Despite my efforts and that of several of my colleagues in the House, the legislation passed the House on October 10, 2002, by a vote of 296-133.   Most significantly, an overwhelming number of Democrats voted against going to war in Iraq, 126 nays to 81 yeas.  Fully 60% of House Democrats rejected the war.  Only six Republicans, including Ron Paul voted “no.”   Bernie Sanders, Independent, also voted “no.”

House Democratic Whip, Nancy Pelosi voted “no,” having issued a statement that included these telling lines:  “Because I do not believe we have exhausted all diplomatic remedies, I cannot support the Administration’s resolution regarding the use of force in Iraq.”

Late that evening, the US Senate approved the Iraq War Resolution by a vote of 77-23, with all Republicans voting “yes.”  Noteworthy Democratic votes for the Iraq War Resolution included Senators Biden, Clinton, Dodd, Edwards, Harkin and Kerry, all of whom were past or future presidential candidates.  Those senators voting “no” included Feingold and Wellstone as well as one-time presidential candidates Graham and Ted Kennedy, with whom I worked closely during the run-up to the vote.

On October 16, 2002, flanked by Secretary of State Powell and Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, President Bush signed the resolution into law, with then senator and future president, Joe Biden, standing close by.

Thus as the United States began preparing to use the full might of its military against Iraq, a horrific realization settled into my heart that the lives of millions of innocent Iraqis were being put at risk, based on fiction promoted by the White House, proliferated by the media and swallowed whole by most congressional leaders. America’s sons and daughters were going to be sent abroad to kill or be killed in pursuit of a mission that was not supported by intelligence agencies and despite easily ascertainable facts and common sense. 

After Congress passed the Iraq War Resolution, the Administration accelerated its effort to cement public approval and international participation in the coming war, focusing on a narrative that Iraq was obtaining uranium for enrichment, preliminary to the building of a nuclear weapon. 

10/30/02:  “…but the danger is so great, with respect to Saddam Hussein having weapons of mass destruction and perhaps terrorists getting hold of such weapons that …. the President is prepared to act with likeminded nations.”  — Secretary of State Colin Powell, interview with Ellen Ratner, Talk Radio News.

11/20/02:  “Today the world is also uniting to answer the unique and urgent threat posed by Iraq.  A dictator who has used weapons of mass destruction on his own people must not be allowed to produce or posses those weapons.  We will not permit Saddam Hussein to blackmail and/or terrorize nations which love freedom.” — President Bush to Prague Atlantic Student Summit.

1/20/03: “The [Iraqi] report also failed to deal with issues which have arisen since 1998, including attempts to acquire uranium and the means to enrich it.” –President Bush, letter to Vice President Cheney and the Senate.

1/28/03: “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.….Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production…. [Saddam Hussein]…could provide one of his hidden weapons to terrorists, or help them develop their own…”  — President Bush, State of the Union Address.

2/5/03:   “Every statement I make today is backed up by sources, solid sources.  These are not assertions.  What we are giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence… Most US experts think [these tubes] are intended to serve as rotors in centrifuges used to enrich uranium…”  — Secretary of State Colin Powell to the United Nations.

2/5/03:  “But the risk of doing nothing, the risk of the security of this country being jeopardized at the hands of a madman with weapons of mass destruction far exceeds the risk of any action we may be forced to take.” — President Bush to the National Economic Council at the White house.

2/6/03:  “All the world has now seen the footage of an Iraqi Mirage aircraft with a fuel tank modified to spray biological agents over wide areas… A UAV launched from a vessel off the American coast could reach hundreds of miles inland.”  –President Bush, Statement from the White House.

3/6/03:  “With every step the Iraqi regime takes toward gaining and deploying the most terrible weapons, our own options to confront that regime will narrow.  And if an emboldened regime were to supply these weapons to terrorist allies, then the attacks of September 11th would be a prelude to far greater horrors.”   — President Bush, Statement in National Press Conference.

3/16/03:  “We believe he [Saddam Hussein] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons.” — Vice President Cheney, Meet the Press.

3/18/03: “Reliance by the United States on further diplomatic and other peaceful means alone with neither (A) protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq nor (B) likely lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq…”  — President Bush letter to Congress.

3/21/03:  “I directed U.S. Armed Forces, operating with other coalition forces, to commence combat operations on March 19, 2003.”  — President Bush, in a letter to Congress.

https://kucinichreport.substack.com/p/iraq-plus-20-lies-as-weapons-of-mass

Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov’s remarks to UN General Assembly – September 29, 2025

We support the unwavering adherence to the principle of equality as it guarantees that all countries can take their rightful place in the world system regardless of their military power, population, territory, or economic capabilities.

From the Foreign Ministry of the Russian Federation

27 September 2025 20:57

Remarks by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at the General Debate of the 80th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, New York, September 27, 2025

1611-27-09-2025

Madam President,

Ladies and gentlemen,

Eighty years ago, the most devastating war in human history came to an end, with more than 70 million lives lost to military operations, starvation, and disease. The year 1945 changed the course of world history forever. The triumph over German Nazism, under whose banners a great part of Europe had rallied, and Japanese militarism, paved the way for peace, recovery, and prosperity.

This year, Moscow and Beijing held celebrations to mark the festive days of May 9 and September 3 in honour of Victory in the Great Patriotic War and World War II. The world witnessed grand military parades in recognition of the Soviet people’s decisive contribution to the defeat of Nazi Germany and the distinct role of the Chinese people in the defeat of militarist Japan. We hold sacred the memory of our combat fellowship with all the allies who stood on the side of truth in the fight against evil forces.

One of the enduring outcomes of that war was the establishment of the United Nations. The principles of this Organisation’s Charter agreed upon by its founding fathers continue to serve as a beacon of international cooperation. They embody the centuries-old experience of co-existence among the states and retain their full relevance in the era of multipolarity. The only remaining task is for all member states without exception to adhere to these principles in their entirety, totality and interconnectedness.

However, the reality is quite different. Systemic and callous violations of the principle of the sovereign equality of states undermine the very faith in justice and lead to crises and conflicts. The root cause of these problems lies in the incessant attempts to divide the world into “friends” and “foes,” into “democracies” and “autocracies,” into a “blooming garden” and a “jungle,” into those who are “at the table” and those who are “on the menu,” into a select few who are above the rules, and the rest, who are somehow obliged to serve the interests of the “golden billion.” We support the unwavering adherence to the principle of equality as it guarantees that all countries can take their rightful place in the world system regardless of their military power, population, territory, or economic capabilities.

Furthermore, the West has repeatedly violated the principle of the non-use of force or threat of force. NATO’s bombing of Yugoslavia, the invasion of Iraq by a US-led coalition and NATO’s regime-change operation in Libya have all brought about tragedies. Today, Israel’s unlawful use of force against the Palestinians, along with aggressive actions targeting Iran, Qatar, Yemen, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq, threaten to trigger explosive developments across the entire Middle East.

Continue reading

China’s statement to UN General Assembly, September 26, 2025

From the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, People’s Republic of China

Statement by Chinese Premier Li Qiang at the General Debate of the 80th Session of the United Nations General Assembly

New York, September 26, 2025

Madam President,
Colleagues,

This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory of the World Anti-Fascist War. It is also the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations (U.N.). Eighty years ago, fascism was defeated in fearless battles by countless heroic men and women around the world, and the U.N. was created upon their ideal of a world free of war.

An important outcome of the victory of the World Anti-Fascist War, the U.N. was born out of a deep reflection on the scourge of two world wars.

Its founding initiated a historic experiment to escape the law of the jungle, and marked the beginning of an extraordinary journey, i.e. building the postwar international order and pursuing peace and development. The past 80 years have been tortuous but purposeful. Today, the U.N. is the world’s most universal, representative, and authoritative intergovernmental organization, and plays an irreplaceable, key role in global governance. With an international system centered around the U.N. and an international order based on international law, human society has realized overall peace, and achieved unprecedented levels of development and prosperity. The past 80 years have witnessed tectonic changes in our world. Straddling two centuries, this period saw human society leapfrog from the age of electricity and computers into a digital intelligence era. While the world we live in has changed enormously, the ideal of making it a better place remains unchanged. Looking back, we can draw a number of valuable inspirations.

First, peace and development are the strongest aspirations shared by the people of all countries. Throughout history, while the shadows of war and conflict have never fully gone away, no force has ever stopped humanity in its quest for peace and development. Having gone through two world wars, we must never forget the bitter lessons learned through bloodshed and loss of lives. For 80 years, a generally peaceful international environment has led to remarkable growth in the global economy. Today, as the desire for peace and development grows even stronger around the world, it is incumbent upon our generation to further strengthen the force for peace and development.

Second, solidarity and cooperation are the most powerful drivers for human progress. In the ferocious years of the World Anti-Fascist War, countries with different social systems, histories and cultures rose above their differences, fought side by side, and prevailed together. In the 80 years that followed, they weathered a succession of vicissitudes, such as the Cold War standoff, financial crises, and global pandemics, by staying connected and working together. All this proves a simple yet powerful point — solidarity lifts everyone up, while division drags all down. The road ahead might be hard and bumpy, but when all countries unite as one and collaborate in good faith, our strengths will converge into a mighty force with which we can withstand any headwind and cross any hurdle.

Third, fairness and justice are the most important values pursued by the international community. In the past 80 years, the world saw the demise of the old colonial system, the establishment of the existing international order, and the strengthening of international rule of law. History keeps reminding us that when might dictates right, the world risks division and regression; when fairness and justice prevail, societies enjoy stability and thrive. Should the era of the law of the jungle return and the weak be left as a prey to the strong, human society would face even more bloodshed and brutality. As members of the global family, we must uphold justice while pursuing our own interests. This is particularly true for the major countries. Only when all countries, big or small, are treated as equals and true multilateralism is practiced, can the rights and interests of all parties be better protected.

Every moment of historical reflection is an opportunity for us to recalibrate our direction and avoid going astray. At present, the world has entered a new period of turbulence and transformation. Unilateralism and Cold War mentality are resurfacing, the international rules and order built over the past 80 years are under serious challenge, and the once-effective international system is constantly disrupted. The various problems induced are distressing and worrying. Humanity has once again come to a crossroads. Anyone who cares about the state of affairs in the world would want to ask: Why couldn’t we humans, having emerged from tribulations, adopt a greater sense of conscience and rationality, and treat each other with kindness and coexist in peace? How could we, in the face of deplorable incidents such as humanitarian disasters, turn a blind eye to atrocities that trample blatantly on fairness and justice and sit on our hands? How could we, when confronted with unscrupulous acts of hegemonism and bullying, remain silent and submissive for fear of might? And how could we let the ardent passion and dedication of our forefathers in founding the U.N. simply fade into the pages of history? We Chinese people often say, “Never forget why you started, and you can accomplish your mission.” Arriving at the U.N. headquarters this time, I saw over 190 national flags lined up in front of the building and fluttering in the breeze; I saw the sculptures “Let Us Beat Swords into Ploughshares” and “Non-Violence” with their time-tested message ever so loud; and I saw staff members from different regions, of different races and with different skin colors working in collaboration for the common goals of humanity. What I saw got me thinking: Those people, objects and scenes that embody peace, progress and development are exactly why we choose to commemorate victory. They are also what inspires us to forge ahead hand in hand. While we may not be able to go back in time and relive the victory, we can definitely create a better future together.

As a founding member of the U.N., China has all along taken an active part in global affairs and worked for the betterment of humanity. Over the years, President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for humanity, the Global Development Initiative, the Global Security Initiative, the Global Civilization Initiative and the Global Governance Initiative, sharing China’s wisdom and solution for navigating global transformations and overcoming pressing challenges. In particular, the Global Governance Initiative proposed at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Tianjin Summit at the beginning of this month underscores the principles of adhering to sovereign equality, abiding by international rule of law, practicing multilateralism, advocating the people-centered approach and focusing on taking real actions. It points the right direction and provides an important pathway for building a more just and equitable global governance system. China is ready to take coordinated and effective actions together with all sides to offer more concrete solutions and promote world peace and development.

First, amid the volatility and turbulence in the world, we must work together for peace and shared security. All countries belong to the same global village and rely on each other for security. We should uphold the vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security, and respect the legitimate security concerns of all countries. We should work in solidarity to address complex and serious security challenges, and settle differences and disputes peacefully through dialogue and consultation. Persisting in camp-based confrontation or willful resort to force only drives peace further away.

China has all along acted as a staunch defender of world peace and security. China is the second largest contributor to U.N. peacekeeping budget and the largest provider of peacekeepers among the permanent members of the Security Council. China has been working actively to promote peace talks on hotspot issues such as the Ukraine crisis and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. This year, China established the International Organization for Mediation together with over 30 countries. China will continue to uphold fairness and justice, proceed from the merits of the issues concerned and the common interests of the international community, and work with all sides to seek the greatest common denominator for peace and play a constructive role in promoting the political settlement of hotspot issues.

Second, amid sluggish global growth, we must reinvigorate cooperation and pursue win-win results. Self-isolation cannot produce lasting development. Only through openness and cooperation can we bolster the momentum of development. A major cause of the current global economic doldrums is the rise in unilateral and protectionist measures, such as tariff hikes and erection of walls and barriers. Ultimately everyone will be worse off. We should collaborate more closely to identify and expand convergence of interests, promote universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalization, and help each other succeed by moving forward in the same direction.

China has always been a key driver of global common development. Over the years, the Chinese economy has maintained steady development, contributing around 30 percent to global economic growth. China has consistently opened its door wider to the world. It has lowered its overall tariff level to 7.3 percent and remained the world’s second largest importer for 16 consecutive years. An active player in international cooperation on sci-tech innovation, China has encouraged the sharing of cutting-edge technologies, such as 5G and AI, and engaged in joint efforts to foster new drivers of economic growth. China has also advanced high-quality Belt and Road cooperation with over 150 countries. Currently, China is taking solid steps to promote high-quality development at home, with a focus on expanding domestic demand and fostering new quality productive forces at a faster pace. China has the confidence and capability to keep its economy on an upward trajectory and continue to provide important support for global economic growth.

Third, amid dynamic interactions among civilizations, we must champion dialogue and mutual enlightenment. We Chinese people often say, “A single flower does not make spring; one hundred flowers in full blossom bring spring to the garden.” Every civilization has its unique value and heritage, and deserves acknowledgment and respect. Obsession with so-called “civilizational superiority” or ideology-based circles only breeds more division and confrontation. Adopting an inclusive attitude and engaging in exchange and mutual learning is a sure way to build more consensus and collective strength.

China has all along engaged in active civilizational exchange and mutual learning. Philosophical concepts such as harmonious coexistence are deeply ingrained in the DNA of the Chinese nation. We actively promote the common values of humanity and never impose our ways on others. Over the next five years, China will carry out 50 development cooperation programs in the field of culture and civilization for fellow developing countries and host 200 thematic training and seminar programs, contributing its part to inter-civilizational dialogue and the progress of civilizations.

Fourth, amid emerging challenges, we must respond with concerted efforts and protect our shared home. Climate change is a major challenge confronting all of us. We should uphold the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, promote the effective implementation of the Paris Agreement, and enhance international collaboration on the green economy. In recent years, technologies such as AI, network communications, and biomanufacturing have advanced rapidly. Along with the benefits, they also bring potential risks. We should adhere to the principles of people-centered development, technology for good and equitable benefits, improve relevant governance rules at a faster pace and strengthen global governance cooperation, so that technological progress could bring real benefits to humanity in a better way.

China has always been a responsible stakeholder in addressing global challenges. Committed to green and low-carbon development, China has established the world’s largest and fastest-growing renewable energy system, and built the most extensive and complete new energy industrial chain. Two days ago, at the United Nations Climate Summit, President Xi Jinping solemnly announced China’s 2035 Nationally Determined Contributions that cover all economic sectors and all greenhouse gases. This is another major step taken by China in responding to global climate change. China is dedicated to deepening cooperation with other countries in areas such as cybersecurity, biosecurity and outer space. China has proposed the Global Al Governance Initiative and advocated the establishment of a World AI Cooperation Organization. This time during the 80th session, China will present to the U.N. the lunar soil samples collected by Chang’e-6 from the far side of the moon. Going forward, China will take more proactive actions and work with all parties to advance global governance in relevant areas.

Colleagues,

China stands ready to work with all members to uphold the standing and authority of the U.N., safeguard the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter, support U.N. reforms to improve its efficiency and capacity to fulfill its mandate, and advocate greater representation and voice of developing countries. China will work with the U.N. to set up a China-U.N. Global South-South Development Facility and provide it with US$10 million in budgetary support. China will also partner with the United Nations Development Programme to establish a global center for sustainable development in Shanghai to accelerate the implementation of the U.N. 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

The tide of history surges forward, and the Great Way remains smooth and steadfast. Going forward, China will continue doing its best to contribute to global peace and development. A steadily developing and highly open China will bring more fresh opportunities to countries around the world. A China that bears in mind the greater good of humanity and stands ready to take up responsibilities will bring more positive energy into the world. China hopes to work with the rest of the world to uphold the ideals of the U.N., carry forward the spirit of multilateralism, actively implement the four major global initiatives, advance toward the lofty goal of building a community with a shared future for humanity, and make our world a more harmonious and beautiful place.

Thank you.

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/zyxw/202509/t20250927_11718404.html

September 30 Webinar: The Fight Against US Bases and Imperialist Plunder

From ILPS

The Fight Against US Bases and Imperialist Plunder

September 30: 8am Puerto Rico | 12pm Mali | 8pm Philippines
Webinar as part of the Land and Liberation education series of the International League of Peoples’ Struggle, featuring speakers from the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Mali on the successful fight against imperialist military bases

Register here

https://peoplesstruggle.org/en/resist-bases/

September 28, Launch event for International People’s Tribunal for Palestine

From ILPS

Launch of the International People’s Tribunal for Palestine

September 28: 4pm Central Europe Time (register to view your time zone)

Part informational session, part campaign launch, this online activity will give you everything you need to know to start preparing for the International People’s Tribunal this November!

Register here

https://peoplesstruggle.org/en/resist-bases/

September 27 webinar: Women Resisting U.S. Military Bases

From International Women’s Alliance

Women Resisting US Military Bases

September 27:
5am Los Angeles
7am Ecuador
8am Puerto Rico
2pm Netherlands
5pm Pakistan
8pm Philippines

Webinar of the International Women’s Alliance as part of the global weeks of action against US military bases

https://peoplesstruggle.org/en/resist-bases/

International Peace Day September 21; ILPS education events and protests against U.S. military bases

From International League of People’s Struggle

The US’s network of military bases and facilities still spans the entire world, and while its main fronts of war strategically focus on Asia and the Pacific, West Asia, and Eastern Europe against its key rivals, regional wars of aggression and violent counter-insurgency campaigns exist throughout Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean as well. New bases are even breaking ground in the Arctic to prepare for war in the open wilderness of the North. Meanwhile, the wide network of US aircraft carriers and submarines make whole oceans terrain for these mobile military bases, while more and more air bases are beginning to be purposed with rocket launchpads for the militarization of space.

US military bases have devastating impacts on people all over the world. These bases are the staging ground for wars of aggression, and that brings the countries that host these bases directly into the wars that the US provokes. The US uses its bases to surveil countries which refuse its imperialist policies. Overseas military bases function as centers where American soldiers violently abuse countless women and extrajudicial killings are endemic around US bases. These overseas installations commit environmental destruction and disrupt the lives of civilians in and out of the bases. Bases dump toxic chemicals that harm the health of residents and destroy the source of livelihood of millions of people.

Yet, foreign bases are not invincible, the people have blocked bases from being built in Korea and Japan, or expelled the US military through mass struggle in cases like Subic Bay Naval Base and Clark Air Force base in the Philippines, the US Navy in Vieques and Culebra in Puerto Rico, refusal of the renewal of the US military base lease in Ecuador, and the recent ouster of French and US bases from Senegal, Chad, Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger.

In the spirit of these historic fights against US military bases and with the militant rage of the people against the ongoing US-Zionist genocide of Palestine, ongoing attempts at US intervention in Venezuela, and many other flashpoints of imperialist war, that the below-signed organizations call for global weeks of action this September 2025!

SIGNATORIES

  • International League of Peoples’ Struggle (ILPS)
  • ILPS Commission 1 (on national liberation)
  • ILPS Commission 4 (on war and peace)
  • Resist US-Led War Movement
  • Resist US-Led War Asia-Pacific Campaign
  • Asia Pacific Research Network
  • International Women’s Alliance
  • Bayan Philippines

ENDORSERS

  • Pakistan Kissan Mazdoor Tehreek (Pakistan)
  • Union des Africains du Quebec et Amis Solidaires de l’Afrique (Canada)
  • Veterans for Peace (USA)
  • Women for Peace (Sweden)
  • Madres Contra la Guerra (Puerto Rico)
  • Malaya Movement Florida (USA)
  • Työväen antimilitaristit (Finland)
  • Diaspora Pa’lante Collective (Puerto Rico)
  • San Diego Veterans For Peace (USA)

Types of activities can include:

  • Protest mobilizations
  • Photo actions
  • Educational discussions
  • Film screenings
  • Production of primers and other educational materials
  • Shared prop – graphics, statements, brochures, etc.
  • Possible joint 24-hour activities in different time zones, to be coordinated on zoom and in person

JOINT DAYS OF ACTION

  • 9/14 – Launch of the weeks of action
  • 9/18 – Online photo action day for all participants
  • 9/21 – International Peace Day and global day of action for the Philippines
  • 9/29 – Solidarity Media Forum for Venezuela

[Website has printable placards to download.]

Upcoming events:

Piquete No al las Bases

September 21: 3pm Puerto Rico Time

Join Madres Contra La Guerra for a mobilization outside Roosevelt Roads, former US Navy Base.

NO US military bases in Puerto Rico! We want independencia! No invasion of Venezuela!

For more events:

https://peoplesstruggle.org/en/resist-bases/

Golden Dome? Interview with Bruce Gagnon, Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space

From Annie Gibbons
Sept. 19, 2025

Please take the time to watch this interview with Bruce Gagnon about Trump’s ominous Golden Dome. Coordinator of Bruce is the coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space, a walking encyclopedia on the militarization of space and a very good friend. (Click the link, not the image.)

(1) Why Trump’s Golden Dome must be opposed – Bruce Gagnon & Dae-Han Song – YouTube

https://annecantstandit.substack.com/p/golden-dome