Yatsenyuk says Ukraine lacks coal for winter, extraordinary measures needed

As Biden, Nuland, and McCain sit warm and toasty, enjoying holiday meals with their families, many of the people of Ukraine will be freezing and starving, including the people in the Donbass.

So many American and NATO leaders yelling “War!” from their armchairs, safe in the comfort of homes far from the suffering, shielded from the consequences.

November 30, 2015-
RusVesna
Translated for Fort Russ by J. Arnoldski

“Yatsenyuk: Ukraine doesn’t have enough coal for the winter, extraordinary measures are needed”
The Prime Minister of Ukraine, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, has stated that Ukraine does not have enough stockpiles of coal for the winter. He demanded that an emergency plan of measures be worked out to solve the problem.
“According to the date which I have, it is clear that, as I warned three months ago, there is not a sufficient supply of coal. In order to avoid power outages as last year, I urgently demand an extraordinary plan of measures in order to pass the winter with a stable energy system in the country. This is now the topic of discussion,” Yatsenyuk stated during a meeting with the anti-crisis energy headquarters. 
According to him, the state has allocated necessary resources, and now needs to get down to business. 
The head of the Ministry of Energy of Ukraine, Vladimir Demchishin, said earlier on Friday that the coal reserves of Ukraine are sufficient for at least one month, “but in the longer term problems will arise.”
According to Demchishin, at the present moment supplies of coal from Russia and Donbass to Ukraine are restricted. 
This week, the Donetsk People’s Republic suspended deliveries of coal to Kiev-controlled territories and has stated that it will not resume deliveries until Ukraine restores the power supply to Crimea. 

Soros Foundation organisations to be banned in Russia

Excellent news!

Translated by Ollie Richardson for Fort Russ
30th November, 2015
Ren.TV

The Russian Prosecutor General’s Office has acknowledged the undesirable activities in Russia of two foreign non-governmental organizations, according to the department’s website.
According to report, the fund “Open Society Institute” and the “Open Society Foundation for Assistance” are considered undesirable. Both organizations are part of the structure of the Soros Foundation.
The decision was made in connection with the Council of the Federation to the Attorney General, the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Minister of Justice on the inspection of organizations included in the so-called patriotic stop list.
“It is established that the activities of the fund “Open Society”(Open Society Foundations) and the Institute “Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation” (OSI Assistance Foundation) represents a threat to the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation and the security of the state “, – a statement said.

Erdogan government arrests Turkish generals for stopping Syria-bound trucks “filled with arms”

Global Research, November 30, 2015
Sputnik 29 November 2015

Two Turkish generals and a colonel were detained on Saturday for intercepting Syria-bound trucks that belonged to Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization (MIT), the newspaper Today’s Zaman reported.

In January 2014, Ankara Gendarmerie Major-General Ibrahim Aydin, former Adana Gendarmerie Brigadier-General Hamza Celepoglu and former Gendarmerie Criminal Laboratory Head Colonel Burhanettin Cihangiroglu stopped Syrian-bound trucks in southern Turkey after they received information from an anonymous source that the trucks were illegally carrying weapons to militants in Syria.

When the information about the trucks became public, MIT officials and high-ranking Turkish politicians, including President Recep Teyyip Erdogan, who was Prime Minister back then, and Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, then the country’s foreign minister, were furious that the gendarmes stopped the trucks and said the Syria-bound trucks were carrying “humanitarian aid” to Turkmen living just south of Turkey, the newspaper said:

“Yes, I’m saying this without any hesitation. That aid was going to the Turkmens. There will be a war next door and we will watch our Turkmen, Arab and Turkish brothers being massacred,” Davutoglu said, as cited by Today’s Zaman.

However, members of opposition parties and some Turkish media said the trucks were indeed transporting weapons to Islamic extremists in Syria.

The gendarmes involved in the interception confirmed that the Syria-bound trucks weren’t going to an area where the Turkmen lived, but to an area populated by radical groups, the Turkish newspaper said.

When an investigation into the MIT case was launched, the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) called the probe as “treason and espionage” on the part of prosecutors.

New Twist in the Story

New developments on the issue took place recently. Last Tuesday, Erdogan answered claims previously made by critics, who said the trucks were filled with weapons, by sarcastically asking them: “What if the MIT trucks were filled with weapons?”

Then on Saturday, contrary to his earlier claims that the MIT trucks were carrying humanitarian aid to Turkmen, Erdogan said the trucks were actually heading on their way to help the Free Syrian Army (FSA).

“They [the gendarmes who revealed the transfer] also exposed those going to the FSA in that way,” Erdogan said on Saturday while addressing his supporters in Balikesir, as cited by Today’s Zaman.

Well, that’s getting pretty confusing — were the trucks delivering “humanitarian aid” to the Turkmen or the FSA then? Just make up your mind, Mr. Erdogan. Where the trucks were heading and what were they carrying after all?

Meanwhile, some very high-ranking Turkish officials, including then-president Abdullah Gul, revealed that the Syria-bound trucks were a “state-secret,” leading to more speculations that the trucks were indeed filled with weapons.

The recent developments are taking place in the wake of a major government crackdown on two Turkish journalists of the Cumhuriyet newspaper, Can Dunbar and Erdem Gul, who we arrested for covering a story and releasing pictures, claiming that Turkish trucks provided weapons to Syrian opposition rebels.

The reason why the Turkish government arrested the journalists is because Erdogan and his ruling party don’t want reporters to write about certain things, such as the government’s support of Syrian rebels, corruption and other important things that people should actually know about, human rights activist Arzu Geybulla said.

Following the arrest of the journalists, who covered Erdogan’s “tender” topic, it looks like the Turkish President is trying to eliminate everyone who’s willing to speak up or reveal the fact that the Turkish government was helping out Islamic extremists in Syria.

All of this comes amid the political scandal involving the downing of the Russian Su-24 by a Turkish Air Force F-16 fighter jet on Tuesday.

After the incident Russia said Turkey was one of the countries which cover the actions of Islamic terrorists in Syria.

“Humanitarian” supplies for ISIS; NATO’s supply convoys halted at Syrian border

The US could be

“…securing the Turkish-Syrian border within Turkey’s territory itself – especially considering that the United States maintains an airbase, training camps, and intelligence outposts within Turkish territory and along the very border ISIS supply convoys are crossing over.”

But it doesn’t. $9 million per day “fighting” ISIS or supplying ISIS? The answer is obvious.

By Tony Cartalucci
Global Research, November 29, 2015
New Eastern Outlook 29 November 2015

For years, NATO has granted impunity to convoys packed with supplies bound for ISIS and Al Qaeda. Russian airstrikes have stopped them dead in their tracks. If a legitimate, well-documented aid convoy carrying humanitarian supplies bound for civilians inside Syria was truly destroyed by Russian airstrikes, it is likely the world would never have heard the end of it.

Instead, much of the world has heard little at all about a supposed “aid” convoy destroyed near Azaz, Syria, at the very edge of the Afrin-Jarabulus corridor through which the so-called Islamic State (ISIS) and Al Qaeda’s remaining supply lines pass, and in which NATO has long-sought to create a “buffer zone” more accurately described as a Syrian-based, NATO-occupied springboard from which to launch terrorism deeper into Syrian territory.

The Turkish-based newspaper Daily Sabah reported in its article, “Russian airstrikes target aid convoy in northwestern Syrian town of Azaz, 7 killed,” claims:

At least seven people died, 10 got injured after an apparent airstrike, reportedly by Russian jets, targeted an aid convoy in northwestern Syrian town of Azaz near a border crossing with Turkey on Wednesday.

Daily Sabah also reported:

Speaking to Daily Sabah, Serkan Nergis from the Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH) said that the targeted area is located some 5 kilometers southwest of the Öncüpınar Border Crossing. 

Nergis said that IHH has a civil defense unit in Azaz and they helped locals to extinguish the trucks. Trucks were probably carrying aid supplies or commercial materials, Nergis added.

Daily Sabah’s report also reveals that the Turkish-Syrian border crossing of Oncupinar is held by what it calls “rebels.” The border crossing of Oncupinar should be familiar to many as it was the scene of Germany’s international broadcaster Deutsche Welle’s (DW) investigative report where DW camera crews videotaped hundreds of trucks waiting at the border, bound for ISIS territory, apparently with full approval of Ankara.

The report was published in November of 2014, a full year ago, and revealed precisely how ISIS has been able to maintain its otherwise inexplicable and seemingly inexhaustible fighting capacity. The report titled, “‘IS’ supply channels through Turkey,” included a video and a description which read:

Every day, trucks laden with food, clothing, and other supplies cross the border from Turkey to Syria. It is unclear who is picking up the goods. The haulers believe most of the cargo is going to the “Islamic State” militia. Oil, weapons, and soldiers are also being smuggled over the border, and Kurdish volunteers are now patrolling the area in a bid to stem the supplies.

The report, and many others like it, left many around the world wondering why, if the US is willing to carry out risky military operations deep within Syrian territory to allegedly “fight ISIS,” the US and its allies don’t commit to a much less riskier strategy of securing the Turkish-Syrian border within Turkey’s territory itself – especially considering that the United States maintains an airbase, training camps, and intelligence outposts within Turkish territory and along the very border ISIS supply convoys are crossing over.

Ideally, NATO should have interdicted these supply convoys before they even crossed over into Syria – arresting the drivers and tracking those who filled the trucks back to their source and arresting them as well. Alternatively, the trucks should have been destroyed either at the border or at the very least, once they had entered into Syria and were clearly headed toward ISIS-occupied territory.

That none of this took place left many to draw conclusions that the impunity granted to this overt logistical network was intentional and implicated NATO directly in the feeding of the very ISIS terrorists it claimed to be “fighting.”

Russia Steps In 

ISIS_ConvoysObviously, any nation truly interested in defeating ISIS would attack it at its very source – its supply lines. Military weaponry may have changed over the centuries, but military strategy, particularly identifying and severing an enemy’s supply lines is a tried and true method of achieving victory in any conflict.

Russia, therefore, would find these convoys a natural target and would attempt to hit them as close to the Syrian-Turkish border as possible, to negate any chance the supplies would successfully reach ISIS’ hands. Russian President Vladmir Putin noted, regarding the Azaz convoy in particular, that if the convoy was legitimately carrying aid, it would have been declared, and its activities made known to all nations operating military aircraft in the region.

The trucks hit in the recent airstrikes, just as they were during the DW investigation, were carrying concrete and steel, not “milk and diapers” as the West would lead audiences to believe. That the supplies were passing through a “rebel” controlled crossing means that the supplies were surely headed to “rebel” controlled territory – either Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front in the west, or ISIS in the east.

Russian airstrikes insured that the supplies reached neither.

Strangling NATO’s Terrorists at the Border 

Russia’s increased activity along the Syrian-Turkish border signifies the closing phases of the Syrian conflict. With Syrian and Kurdish forces holding the border east of the Euphrates, the Afrin-Jarabulus corridor is the only remaining conduit for supplies bound for terrorists in Syria to pass. Syrian forces have begun pushing east toward the Euphrates from Aleppo, and then will move north to the Syrian-Turkish border near Jarabulus. Approximately 90-100 km west near Afrin, Ad Dana, and Azaz, it appears Russia has begun cutting off terrorist supply lines right at the border. It is likely Syrian forces will arrive and secure this region as well.

For those that have criticized Russia’s air campaign claiming conflicts can’t be won from the air without a ground component, it should be clear by now that the Syrian Arab Army is that ground component, and has dealt ISIS and Al Qaeda its most spectacular defeats in the conflict.

When this corridor is closed and supplies cut off, ISIS, Nusra, and all associated NATO-backed factions will atrophy and die as the Syrian military restores order across the country. This may be why there has been a sudden “rush” by the West to move assets into the region, the impetus driving the United States to place special forces into Syrian territory itself, and for Turkey’s ambush of a Russian Su-24 near the Syrian-Turkish border.

What all of this adds up to is a clear illustration of precisely why the Syrian conflict was never truly a “civil war.” The summation of support for militants fighting against the Syrian government and people, has come from beyond Syria’s borders. With that support being cut off and the prospect of these militants being eradicated, the true sponsors behind this conflict are moving more directly and overtly to salvage their failed conspiracy against the Syrian state.

What we see emerging is what was suspected and even obvious all along – a proxy war started by, and fought for Western hegemonic ambitions in the region, intentionally feeding the forces of extremism, not fighting them.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazineNew Eastern Outlook”.

US-NATO starts new phase of training and equipping Ukrainian military, against Minsk

Global Research, November 29, 2015
TASS 26 November 2015
Ukraine Troops

The United States has launched a new phase of training of Ukrainian servicemen, a fact, which may have negative consequences for the future of the Donbas truce, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova said on Thursday.

 She recalled that 300 US instructors from the 173rd US airborne brigade had trained three battalions – 780 people – for Ukraine’s National Guard in a period from April to November. “It is noteworthy that the training completed at a time when the situation on the line of contact in Donbas started getting worse and the newly trained people were apparently sent there,” Zakharova said.

“Now the Americans and their NATO colleagues, including the Lithuanians and Canadians, will train a new group of Ukrainian troopers. It is clear that such preparations are unlikely to deescalate tensions and may have a negative impact on the fragile truce in the country’s southeast,” the Russian diplomat stressed.

“The presence of foreign paratroopers and their weapons on the Ukrainian soil means gross violation of the Minsk package of measures, point 10 in particular, by the Kiev government,” Zakharova said adding that point 10 provides for the OSCE-monitored withdrawal of all foreign units, military vehicles and mercenaries from the Ukrainian territory.

“It does not say that this provision applies exclusively to (Ukraine’s) eastern provinces. The Kiev authorities unequivocally took a commitment which does not contain any reservations and concerns the entire territory under their control,” the Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson said.

US Navy Captain Jeff Davis, a spokesperson for the US Department of Defense, has recently said that the United States is starting a second phase of training of the Ukrainian army and is planning to train and equip six army battalions, including one special operations unit.

Ukrainian troopers will undergo training according to the US Fearless Guardian program launched in 2014. At its first stage, the United States trained and equipped the National Guard units, which are subordinate to Ukraine’s Interior Ministry. Now, the US instructors will train army battalions.

Three hundred military instructors of the 173rd airborne brigade of the United States Army based in Vicenza, Italy, will undergo training at the Yavorovsky testing ground in the Lviv region, Western Ukraine. A special operations battalion will be prepared in the West Ukrainian city of Khmelnitsky.

“The Hunger Games” and today’s U.S. political leaders: Donald Sutherland explains the movie’s important message

Global Research, November 29, 2015
The Free Thought Project 28 November 2015

There are some inside Hollywood, who are trying to wake up the world – Donald Sutherland is one of them.

The young people who see this film must recognize that for the future ‘blind faith in their leaders,’ as Bruce Springsteen said, ‘will get you dead.’

Hollywood actor, Donald Sutherland just dropped a bombshell on the military industrial complex. Sutherland, who plays President Coriolanus Snow in the blockbuster movie series Hunger Games, was recently asked what the movie was really about – he held no punches in his answer.

If there’s any question as to what it’s an allegory for I will tell you.

It is the powers that be in the United States of America.

It’s profiteers.

War is for profit. It’s not “to save the world for democracy” or “for king and country.”

No, bulls**t.

It’s for the profit of the top 10%, and the young people who see this film must recognize that for the future ‘blind faith in their leaders,’ as Bruce Springsteen said, “will get you dead.

Those who are awake to the war machine, and have watched the movies or read the books, have undoubtedly seen the underlying anti-establishment theme within. However, those who do not notice it should heed Sutherland’s words.

It is no question that war is for the profit of very few people. In fact, as the famous, two-time Medal of Honor recipient, Major General Smedley Butler of the USMC said,

WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?

Sutherland does get one thing wrong, however, and that is the percentage that he assigns to those who profit from war. It is nowhere near 10% as he states. Those who profit from war, as Smedley Butler points out above, are a tiny group of people. The ruling elite.

It’s the weapons manufacturers, the arms dealers, the inside politicians, and the state itself. Everyone else involved in war, including those who die for it, are merely pawns. They are cogs in the machine whose only purpose is to spread death and destruction.

Please share this article and video so that others, who may have missed the point of this movie series, may see its true purpose – calling out the elite for the criminals that they are.

ISPOVEST CIA AGENTA: Dati su nam milioni da rasparčamo SFRJ, podmitili smo stranke i političare koji su raspaljivali mržnju među narodima, a krajnji cilj je bio da vas napravimo robovima!

Šta mislite generalno zašto se Jugoslavija raspala, tjst zašto je Vaša vlada imala želju da to uradi?

Sve je jasno, ljudi koji su nekad huškali na rat a ujedno i pripovedali o miru sada su vlasnici kompanija koje eksploatišu razna rudna bogatstva i slično! Jednostavno, napravili su od Vas robove, vaši ljudi rade za džabe i taj proizvod ide u Nemačku i Ameriku, oni zarađuju! A Vi još na kraju morate da otkupite i uvezete ono što ste sami napravili, pošto nemate novca, morate se zadužiti, to je čitava priča sa celim Balkanom!

…Kosovo je oduzeto iz dva razloga, prvo zbog rudnih i prirodnih resursa a drugo, Kosovo je vojna baza NATO-a! U srcu Evrope je njihova najveća vojna baza.

Imate li poruku za ljude iz bivše Jugoslavije?

Imam. Neka zaborave prošlost, ona je iscenirana i lažirana.Izmanipulisani ste, oni su dobili šta su hteli i glupo je da se Vi još mrzite, morate pokazati da ste jači i da ste shvatili ko je sve napravio! Ja se iskreno izvinjavam! Zato dugo vremena i otkrivam tajne CIA i Bele kuće!

Web-Tribune.com
Objavljeno: 22. novembar 2015.

Moj šef, koji je inače i bio nekada u Američkom senatu je nekoliko puta napomenuo da će biti nekakva prevara u Bosni. Mesec dana pred navodni genocid u Srebrenici mi je rekao da će taj grad biti uporište medija širom sveta i dao nam je instrukcije da zovemo medije.

robert-baer

Robert Baer, bivši visoki izaslanik i oficir CIA, ujedno je i autor mnogih dela u kojima je odavao informacije o CIA i o administraciji Bila Klinton i Džordža Buša, zbog čega je nekoliko puta hapšen i privođen. Lični prijatelj, Mitt Waspurh koji je radio u senatu i koji mu je davao pojedine informacije je ubijen u hotelu iz sačmare. Kao visoki operativac CIA radio je na prostoru Jugoslavije u periodu od (1991-1994) i na Bliskom istoku. Robert Baer je učestvovao u nekoliko dokumentaraca na Nacionalnoj Geografiji optužujući vladu Buša za rat zbog nafte!

Intervju je obavljen uživo u Kanadi, tokom mog puta pre nekoliko dana. Robert Baer trenutno promoviše svoju knjigu -The secret of White House- u Kvebeku, gde smo i razgovarali. U intervjuu smo razgovarali o pozadini rata u Jugoslaviji.

Kad ste stigli u Jugoslaviju,gde je to tačno bilo i koji Vam je bio prvi zadatak?

Stigao sam helikopterom sa još 3 agenta. Sleteli smo 12. Januara 1991 u Sarajevo. Zadatak nam je bio da pripazimo na navodne teroriste srpske nacionalnosti, koji bi trebali napasti Sarajevo.

O kojim teroristima je reč i zašto bi oni navodno trebali da izvrše te napade?

O srpskim, dati su nam fajlovi da grupa po imenu „Vrhovna Srbija“ planira izvesti bombaške napade na ključne zgrade u Sarajevu zbog želje da Bosna izađe iz tadašnje Jugoslavije.

Da li je takva grupa postojala i šta ste Vi tačno radili u Sarajevu po naradbi komande CIA?

Takva grupa nikad nije postojala! I nas je centrala prevarila. Imali smo zadatak da upozoravamo i da širimo paniku među političarima u Bosni, jednostavno punili smo im glavu da će Srbi da napadnu. U početku smo i mi prihvatili priču, ali posle smo se malo zapitali. Zašto dižemo paniku kad ta grupa oligledno ni ne postoji?

Kako i kada se završila ta operacija i da li je imala neko ime?

Za mene se završila nakon 2 nedelje, dobio sam novi zadatak u Sloveniji. Inače operacija je trajala još mesec dana i imala je naziv „ISTINA“. Iako je to bilo sve samo ne to!

Kažete otišli ste u Sloveniju, kojim povodom?

Tamo sam dobio instrukcije da je Slovenija spremna da proglasi nezavisnost, date su nam pare, nekoliko miliona dolara, uz taj novac mi smo financirali razne nevladine organizacije, opozicione stranke i razne političare koji su raspaljivali mržnju.

Kakvo ste Vi imali mišljenje zbog te propagande od strane CIA, i šta su o tome mislisle vaše kolege?

Svakako da se zadatak ne odbija od CIA, pogotovo ne tada jer su svi bili nervozni i skloni paranoji! Mnogi agenti i visoki činovnici CIA su nestajali samo zato što su odbili da rade propagandu protiv srba u Jugoslaviji. Ja lično sam bio šokiran dozom laži naše agencije i političara! Mnogi agenti CIA su radili propagandu a da nisu ni svesni šta rade. Jednostavno svako radi delić priče, i samo onaj ko je sklopio celu priču zna pozadinu a to su političari.

Znači postojala je propaganda isključivo prema Srbima?

Da i ne. Propaganda je imala za cilj da zavadi države i da se one odvoje od matične Jugoslavije. Morali smo izabrati žrtveno jagnje koje bi bilo krivo za sve. Neko ko bi bio odgovoran za rat i nasilje. Srbije je izabrana jer je na neki način bila naslednica Jugoslavije.

Možete li nabrojati političare koji su u bivšoj Jugoslaviji bili plaćeni od strane CIA?

Da, mada je to delikatno. Stipe Mesić, Franjo Tuđman, Alija Izebegović, mnogi savetnici i članovi vlade Jugoslavije, plaćeni su i bili srpski generali, novinari pa čak i pojedine vojne formacije. Jedno vreme je plaćen bio i Radovan Karadžić ali je prestao da uzima pomoć kad je shvatio da će biti žrtvovan i optužen za zločine u Bosni. Bio je izrađen od Američke administracije.

Spomenuli ste kontrolu i finansiranje medija, kako je to bilo tačno?

To se već zna, pojedini agenti CIA su bili zaduženi za pisanje zvaničnih izjava koje bi spikeri čitali na vestima. Naravno spikeri nisu ništa znali, oni su to dobili od svog šefa a on od svog koji je bio naš čovek. Postojao je jedan zadatak za sve, a to je da se kroz televiziju širi mržnja, nacionalizam i skroz su se isticale razlike među ljudima.

Srebrenica, svi znamo za nju. Možete li reći nešto o tome ukoliko znate?

Da! Od 1992 sam u Bosni bio ponovo, ali ovog puta smo trebali da obučavamo vojne formacije koje su predstavljale Bosnu, novu državu koja samo što je proglasila nezavisnost. Srebrenica je preuveličana priča i nažalost veliki broj ljudi su izmanipulisani. Broj žrtava je jedank ubijenim srbima i drugima ali Srebrenica je politički marketing. Moj šef, koji je inače i bio nekada u Američkom senatu je nekoliko puta napomenuo da će biti nekakva prevara u Bosni. Mesec dana pred navodni genocid u Srebrenici mi je rekao da će taj grad biti uporište medija širom sveta i dao nam je instrukcije da zovemo medije. Kad sam pitao zašto, rekao je videćeš. Dobijena je naredba da sa novonastalom Bošnjačkom vojskom udarimo po kućama i civilima. Naravno to su bili građani Srebrenice. U tom trenutku sa druge strane udarili su i Srbi. Verovatno je i njih neko platio i nahuškao!

Ko bi onda mogao kriv biti za genocid u Srebrenici?

Jednostavno žrtve u Srebrenici su bile tu zbog Bosanaca, Srba i Amerikanaca to jest nas! Ali sve je prepisano Srbima. Nažalost mnoge žrtve su sahranjene kao muslimani a bili su Srbi ili druge nacionalnosti. Pre nekoliko godina je moj drug, bivši agent CIA i sadašnji čovek u MMF-u rekao da je Srebrenica proizvod dogovora između Američke vlade i političare u Bosni. Srebrenica kao grad je žrtvovana jer je nakon tog navodnog zločina srba, Amerika imala povoda za napad.

Šta mislite generalno zašto se Jugoslavija raspala, tjst zašto je Vaša vlada imala želju da to uradi?

Sve je jasno, ljudi koji su nekad huškali na rat a ujedno i pripovedali o miru sada su vlasnici kompanija koje eksploatišu razna rudna bogatstva i slično! Jednostavno, napravili su od Vas robove, vaši ljudi rade za džabe i taj proizvod ide u Nemačku i Ameriku, oni zarađuju! A Vi još na kraju morate da otkupite i uvezete ono što ste sami napravili, pošto nemate novca, morate se zadužiti, to je čitava priča sa celim Balkanom!

Niste bili na Kosovu aktivni kao agent CIA, ali da li je i tu bilo nekog pritiska od strane Amerike?

Kako ne! Kosovo je oduzeto iz dva razloga, prvo zbog rudnih i prirodnih resursa a drugo, Kosovo je vojna baza NATO-a! U srcu Evrope je njihova najveća vojna baza.

Imate li poruku za ljude iz bivše Jugoslavije?

Imam. Neka zaborave prošlost, ona je iscenirana i lažirana.Izmanipulisani ste, oni su dobili šta su hteli i glupo je da se Vi još mrzite, morate pokazati da ste jači i da ste shvatili ko je sve napravio! Ja se iskreno izvinjavam! Zato dugo vremena i otkrivam tajne CIA i Bele kuće!

(Webtribune.rs)

http://web-tribune.com/iza-kulisa/ispovest-cia-agenta-dati-su-nam-milioni-da-rasparcamo-sfrj-podmitili-opozicione-stranke-i-politicare-koji-su-raspaljivali-mrznju-medu-narodima-a-krajnji-cilj-je-bio-da-vas-napravimo-robovima#