The Russian Ambassador to the U.N. Vassily Nebenzia spoke at the U.N. Security Council meeting on the political situation in Venezuela on January 26, 2019.
Excerpt from English translation:
…Today we are examining here unfortunately the most typical case of what is called “a threat to international peace and security created by the threat of the use of force against the political independence of a state”.
The authors of the UN Charter — and by the way, among those authors and one of the main authors was the United States – tried to save the world from these kinds of events, included this warning in Chapter 2.4. But obviously Washington hasn’t opened that book for quite a long time
Such gross interference by the United States in the internal affairs of another state is nothing new. Americans have not changed and, judging by everything, do not intend to change their relationship to Latin America as an area of exclusive interest of the United States — a kind of backyard where you can do anything you want without taking into account the interests of the people living there.
We’re talking about the reincarnation of the so-called Monroe Doctrine, about which President Trump openly spoke during his statement at the high-level segment at the 73rd General Assembly.
Back in 1913, President Woodrow Wilson spoke about how the United States intended to teach the republics of South America to elect good people..
Well, today that lesson is being visited on Venezuela who dared, at least in past, to conduct an independent policy that does not comply with the economic and political interests of the warden who watches over the Western hemisphere.
I would like to quote the words of another American president spoken in Congress on the eve of the creation of the United Nations. He was one of the founding fathers of this organization. He considered this his main political project and truly believed that its creation made it possible to ensure humanity would not not experience wars and conflicts. I’m talking about Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The Yalta Accords are ”ought to spell the end of unilateral actions, spheres of influence, balance of power, and exclusive alliances that have been tried for centuries and have always failed.”
Unfortunately, the real policy of the United States in the Western, and not just Western, hemisphere is in stark contrast to these noble and just ideals.
Regime change is the favorite geopolitical game of the United States…