John McCain, Conductor of the “Arab Spring” and the Caliph

Everyone has noticed the contradiction of those who recently characterized the Islamic Emirate as “freedom fighters” in Syria and who are indignant today faced with its abuses in Iraq. But if that speech is incoherent in itself, it makes perfect sense in the strategic plan: the same individuals were to be presented as allies yesterday and must be as enemies today, even if they are still on orders from Washington. Thierry Meyssan reveals below US policy through the particular case of Senator John McCain, conductor of the “Arab Spring” and longtime partner of Caliph Ibrahim.

Voltaire Network | Damascus (Syria) | 18 August 2014

JPEG - 21.9 kb
Are Barack Obama and John McCain political opponents as they claim, or are they working together on the imperialist strategy of their country?

John McCain is known as the leader of the Republicans and unhappy 2008 US presidential candidate. This is, we will see, only the real part of his biography, which serves as a cover to conduct covert actions on behalf of his government.

When I was in Libya during the “Western”attack, I was able to view a report of the foreign intelligence services. It stated that, on February 4, 2011 in Cairo, NATO organized a meeting to launch the “Arab Spring” in Libya and Syria. According to this document, the meeting was chaired by John McCain. The report detailed the list of Libyan participants, whose delegation was led by the No. 2 man of the government of the day, Mahmoud Jibril, who abruptly switched sides at the entrance of the meeting to become the opposition leader in exile. I remember that, among the French delegates present, the report quoted Bernard-Henry Lévy, although officially he had never exercised functions within the French government. Many other personalities attended the symposium, including a large delegation of Syrians living abroad.

Emerging from the meeting, the mysterious Syrian Revolution 2011 Facebook account called for demonstrations outside the People’s Council (National Assembly) in Damascus on February 11. Although this Facebook account at the time claimed to have more than 40,000 followers, only a dozen people responded to its call before the flashes of photographers and hundreds of police. The demonstration dispersed peacefully and clashes only began more than a month later in Deraa. [1]

On February 16, 2011, a demonstration underway in Benghazi, in memory of members of the Islamic Fighting Group in Libya [2] massacred in 1996 in the Abu Selim prison, degenerated into shooting. The next day, a second event, this time in memory of those who died by attacking the Danish consulate during the Muhammad cartoons affair, also degenerated into shooting. At the same time, members of the Islamic Fighting Group in Libya ,coming from Egypt and coordinated by unidentified, hooded individuals, simultaneously attacked four military bases in four different cities. After three days of fighting and atrocities, the rebels launched the uprising of Cyrenaica against Tripolitania [3]; a terrorist attack that the western press falsely presented as a “democratic revolution” against “the regime” of Muammar el-Qaddafi.

On February 22nd, John McCain was in Lebanon. He met members of the Future Movement (the party of Saad Hariri) whom he charged to oversee the transfer of arms to Syria around the MP Okab Sakr [4]. Then, leaving Beirut, he inspected the Syrian border and the selected villages including Ersal, which were used as a basis to back mercenaries in the war to come.

The meetings chaired by John McCain were clearly the trigger point for a long-prepared Washington plan; the plan that would have the UK and France attack Libya and Syria simultaneously, following the doctrine of “leadership from behind” and the annex of the Treaty of Lancaster House of November 2010. [5]

The Illegal Trip to Syria, April 2013

In May 2013, Senator John McCain made his way illegally to near Idleb in Syria via Turkey to meet with leaders of the “armed opposition”. His trip was not made public until his return to Washington. [6]

This movement was organized by the Syrian Emergency Task Force, which, contrary to its title, is a Zionist Organization led by a Palestinian employee of AIPAC [7]

JPEG - 26.1 kb
John McCain in Syria. In the foreground at right is the director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force. In the doorway, center, Mohammad Nour.

In photographs released at that time, one noticed the presence of Mohammad Nour, a spokesman for the Northern Storm Brigade (of the Al-Nosra Front, that is to say, al-Qaeda in Syria), who kidnapped and held 11 Lebanese Shiite pilgrims in Azaz. [8] Asked about his proximity to al-Qaeda kidnappers, the Senator claimed not to know Mohammad Nour who would have invited himself into this photo.

The affair made a great noise and the families of the abducted pilgrims lodged a complaint before the Lebanese judiciary against Senator McCain for complicity in kidnapping. Ultimately, an agreement was reached and the pilgrims were released.

Let’s suppose that Senator McCain had told the truth and that he was abused by Mohammad Nour. The object of his illegal trip to Syria was to meet the chiefs of staff of the Free Syrian Army. According to him, the organization was composed “exclusively of Syrians” fighting for “their freedom” against the “Alouite dictatorship” (sic). The tour organizers published this photograph to attest to the meeting.

JPEG - 26.5 kb
John McCain and the heads of the Free Syrian Army. In the left foreground, Ibrahim al-Badri, with which the Senator is talking. Next, Brigadier General Salim Idris (with glasses).

If we can see Brigadier General Idriss Salem, head of the Free Syrian Army, one can also see Ibrahim al-Badri (foreground on the left) with whom the senator is talking. Back from the surprise trip, John McCain claimed that all those responsible for the Free Syrian Army were “moderates who can be trusted” (sic).

JPEG - 24.2 kb

However, since October 4, 2011, Ibrahim al-Badri (also known as Abu Du’a) was on the list of the five terrorists most wanted by the United States (Rewards for Justice). A premium of up to $ 10 million was offered to anyone who would assist in his capture. [9] The next day, October 5, 2011, Ibrahim al-Badri was included in the list of the Sanctions Committee of the UN as a member of Al Qaeda. [10] Continue reading →

Nazi Safaris in Ukraine — “Some Are Willing to Pay to Hunt Insurgents”– VIDEO

By Ilja Degtjarov

Salvyangrad.org, August 18, 2014

Global Research, August 19, 2014

As a basic principle we refrain from showing videos in which prisoners of war are questioned. However with this article we make an exception, because the video confirms what the interviewed insurgent states as well in the following text: that the Ukrainian army commits war crimes and buries their own dead in mass graves. So it is worthwhile to read both the text and to watch the video – two completely independent sources.

An interview with an insurgent from the Eastern Ukraine. He lives and fights in an area where the Ukrainian army was shattered three weeks ago, close to the Russian border in the Donetsk region. He stayed quiet about his name to me, but he was a wealthy businessman before the war. The interview was recorded mid-August and translated into German directly and from German. Some accuracy might have been lost when the German was translated to English.

Recorded by: Ilja Degtjarov

Why have you become an insurgent?

Because I do not agree with this Government and the things that are happening. I do not agree with this attitude towards the people. I could not bear it anymore to watch the people being tormented. Therefore, I have become an insurgent even though I’m already 53 years old. I do not agree that they came into my region. I will protect my trees, my stones, houses, children, women and everything else.

Where do you draw your optimism? You fight against the Ukrainian army and thousands of foreign mercenaries. The whole West backs the Ukraine. Why do you remain optimistic that you gain the upper hand?

We have a heroic people who have never knelt down. The victory will be ours, and if we still die, then better standing than on our knees. We have our vision, we have something that we want to fight for. Our grandchildren will grow up here. And if we die ourselves, our grandchildren will live as one must live, that is in a free country.

In much of the Western mass media it is reported that in reality the insurgents are composed of Russian special units or parts of the regular Russian army. What do you think?

We are not fighting for Russia, we are fighting for our people. Russia is a free country, a country where one can freely live without submissive bows to the United States and the EU. We know how you can live in Russia and we want to live like that as well. We do not want to bow before anyone, or worship anybody. We are a free people.

What do you think is wrong with the new Ukrainian Government? What caused this movement in the Donbass region?

These people have come to power through blood. Now they want to drown the whole Ukraine in the blood. Although they talk about the “free Ukraine” this country was never free, it always had to be subordinate to someone. Now the Ukraine is knuckling under to the United States of America, a country that suppresses all countries and is inciting wars everywhere. Actually, this country [USA] should be eliminated completely from the Atlas. Well, for the time being we will reach Poland, there we will wash our boots and then we will go on.

Back to the previous question: are the insurgents primarily local citizens or are they mostly Russian volunteers or even the nasty Russian army, dressed up with foreign uniforms, as some claim?

Insurgents are people who just yesterday were working with a hoe and a spade; who cared for their gardens. Then they laid down their tools and now they protect their gardens with machine guns. We are freedom-loving people. Even women, children and seniors go fight with us.

How would you describe the ideology of the people who have come to power in Kiev? In the West they say, of course, that they are flawless Democrats, who simply want to be different than Russians. Would you call them Democrats or perhaps something else?

I understand democracy in the way that one can express his will; and not that someone else speaks on your behalf. I still remember how you voted about the separation [of the USSR]: at that time also nobody cared to listen to us. Even now they are pursuing a unilateral policy. They want to see only that, what happens on the other side [in the Western Ukraine]. They are unaware of the suffering of our mothers and fathers. This is not a democracy, but fascism in its worst form. Not even fascists have killed children in this way, destroyed houses, poisoning the land with ecologically dangerous bombs. They bombard us with white phosphorous bombs and cluster munitions. They bombard us with cluster bombs, so that millions of small metal particles fly in all directions and on whole streets, everyone is killed, including women and children. After such bombings nothing is left, not even animals, but only burnt earth. Is this democracy? Do they fight this way for democracy? No, that is fascism.

Who fights on the side of the Ukrainian army? What is meant by foreigners?

We had prisoners of war from Poland. There are very many foreign instructors, granade launchers. Our [Ukrainian] soldiers do not want to fight, according to the prisoners of war, thus they are threatening them and their families with death. In the Ukrainian army they are even killing wounded.

So people in the vicinity of Kramatorsk were massacred, their organs have been retrieved; then their bodies were buried with tractors and compacted on top with armored cars. So they are hiding the evidence of their crimes. This also applies to Krasnodon: they destroyed their own people. (Editor’s note: compare with video)

The insurgents, the so-called “terrorists”, have left no one wounded in the lurch. They also help the civilians, the sick, all those in need.

So there are actually facts that they retrieved organs, apparently to sell them?

Yes. There is someone they can ask about this, can’t they? [ask to another insurgent]. We have people from Kramatorsk, who observed that.

Have you seen it with your own eyes?

Yes, with my own eyes. (Another insurgent in the background): We cannot reveal our sources.

You do not need to do. Such information before was at the level of “someone has heard that someone has heard” …

Why, yes! That has been seen even by our reconnaissance. Even prisoners of war confirm this. Bodies were buried with excavators.

Apart from the Polish, who else is fighting [against you]?

If we link up into their radio conversations, we hear foreign languages. But I don’t know which ones. And the Poles are found everywhere.

Why did they come? Are they mercenaries or regular units, sent here by force?

These are people, among others, who are even willing to pay to be allowed to hunt people. They pay that they may fire on living people with sniper rifles. If there are no insurgents, they shoot civilians. For example, there was a man driving to work with his bicycle and they have shot off his head just for fun.

Do you mean a specific case?

Yes, a week ago. The man was completely harmless. A sniper shot him, for fun. (Another insurgent in the background): We’ve seen it, it was a hundred meters away from us. He was just going to work.

I have read about such cases, but I have not heard directly of that.

That was in Krasnopartisansk.

Why do the new leaders consider themselves entitled to kill such vast amounts of people? There used to whining all over the world, that allegedly some students on the Maidan were beaten. Now thousands are dying, and nobody cares. Why? Why the double moral standards – what ideology is it?

[About] these double standards, I understand the following: Ukraine executes commands from the West, it has no will of its own. Ukraine is eliminating people who are in the way for the coal and gas production of the Americans. They do not need our people here and destroy them therefore, area-wide. It is not a question of eliminating some of us, it is about to annihilate us comprehensively, using Grad [rocket] launchers, mines, surface-to-surface systems [ballistic missiles]. There are bombs, which leave a crater three metres deep and eight metres wide. Within a radius of 300 meters nothing is left alive. Thus, they destroy cities. Women and children are hiding in cellars and they burn them there with flame-throwers and explosives. They do not “only” kill families, but inhabitants of entire apartment buildings. The killing of insurgents’ wives is particularly enjoyed. Is it even possible not to fight against those guys? We are simply obliged to neutralize this contagious infection that is spreading in our country.

If we consider the situation realistically: at the end of 2013 the Ukrainian army had about 4,000 armoured cars according to official data. The insurgents have only a few of them, so you cannot compare the forces. This huge mass [the Ukrainian army] is overwhelming and additionally there are these, for example, Polish armored cars. How can you beat this endless mass?

They fight for the money or out of fear that their families may be hurt, if they fight badly, or something similar. We fight for the lives of our children, for our country. That is a big difference. They fight without a vision and we have one. This will always win. We do not feed ourselves as well, but our spirit is stronger than theirs. No doubt, we will win because we are fighting for our people, while they came to our region, to take it away from us.

Were there cases that the Ukrainian army shelled buses or cars in which were clearly refugees?

Several times – even if it was written in large letters [on cars] that there were children. They shot at big crowds before customs houses. They fired at a seven-kilometer queue with grenade launchers and howitzers. People were running in all directions and left their stuff. As a slightly different example, next to the border an alarm system responded very loud at something; the children from the Donetsk region, from Kramatorsk thought that they would soon be bombarded. Which psyche can such children have?

What else is the Ukrainian army doing that you definitely do not know in the West?

Even people from the Stone Age have not done anything like these people in the 21st century. They torture, they kill people, break arms, cut off fingers, chop off heads and see how long you can still walk without a head. Everything you can imagine as horrible at all, they already do. We speak the same language, we had the same ABC-books at the school, so it is incomprehensible to me, through what influence they became the way they are.

Can you give specific examples? Without a name.

They shot at refugees, i.e. people who are already scared, with grenade launchers; with machine guns as in a shooting gallery, if people were clearly visible on a street. They did not shot to warn, but to kill. By the side of the road cars are lying around and they [Ukrainian army] do not allow the bodies to be picked up. Accordingly it smelled noisome due to decomposition of the bodies. Only after the liberation of the area the corpses could be removed. So they are fighting so against children, against women; and yet once they see armed men they lay down their arms and surrender with a white flag.

Regarding Boeing [MH17]: In the West it was proclaimed immediately – without ifs and buts – that the insurgents shot down the aircraft. [They said] Putin had given both the money and the BUK [missile] system, so Putin is to blame personally. Anything you can say?

I know nothing about that, but it is clear that the insurgents would never shoot down an airliner. Insurgents are fighting for people’s lives and it is unimaginable to save people with one hand and to execute people with the other hand.

Were there cases, where the Ukrainian army shelled towns and villages, when there was no insurgency at all?

This is their action model: first they use mines and missiles and then they penetrate into the cities. First they destroy and then they begin to “protect” the destroyed. They destroy absolutely everything. They destroy the people as one chops down a forest. They do not care whether it’s women or children, disabled people in wheelchairs, no matter whether there are insurgents in the city or not.

What use is it to shoot peaceful cities and civilians? What do they want to achieve with this?

We have here the city of Molodogwardejsk. Although there are no rebels at all, this town has been destroyed from a safe distance with howitzers. For them it is simply to destroy cities and leave a desert. Why do they do it, you have to ask them yourself. In the meantime we can now not even trust their white flag. Under the white flag, they perform regrouping of their forces and then begin to shoot again. You can no longer trust them – neither the army nor the Government. This is scum of humanity. When you look at their resumes, it becomes clear that they belong in a zoo. Until they sit in cages, children don’t have to be afraid of them any more. That would be my only wish.

How can you explain that even in some areas of the South East [of Ukraine] the junta has currently de facto won, for example, in Dnepropetrovsk? Why have large parts of the population changed sides ideologically? Why isn’t there any significant resistance?

Our country is poor. At first poor people earned from participating at the Maidan. You just went there [to Kiev] to earn the money. There it took people, to create large crowds – I would say herds of people. There they were given drugs, e.g. in tea. By the way, after their return home they have detected withdrawal symptoms in them. In addition, they received a brainwashing at Maidan. And only the people from Donbass were not going there; they had to work in this industrial area, they had to earn the money for the whole country, feeding the country. Therefore they still cannot subdue us. We have endured it as long as we could it. But at some point we could not any longer, which led to the uprising. It was always so in Russia: they harness slowly, but they ride fast.

What will happen with these cities [outside of the Donbass] now? Certainly one can assume that the vast majority of them are also against the Kiev Government, but this majority is suppressed and stays silent. But in my opinion, they should also liberated, otherwise they will be taken sooner or later, so that they support the junta. Then they are lost forever.

But we will liberate these towns as well. We will not punish anyone; everybody can have his own opinion. We will present our point of view, but will not impose our opinion. If someone wants to follow us, just go ahead, but if not, then not. Then they can simply go to lead their lives, to work.

It is summer. It is still warm and the streets are well passable. But in winter it is cold, un-asphalted roads will become impassable dirt, so that you can hardly deliver humanitarian aid from Russia. In many cities there is now no electricity, no water, no heating. How will you survive then?

We are a strong people. We are used to difficulties. And we will overcome these obstructions as well, whether in rain or snowstorms. We are serious about what we have started, and we will not stop now just like that. We will fight to the end, there is no way back.

Is there evidence that Americans sit in the military administration and give orders?

I can say nothing about that. Everyone makes his task here and since I’m not a scout I am not able to answer the question.

To what extent does the local population support the insurgents: Is it 95%, 70%, 50%?

You can judge for yourself: people harvest potatoes and give us some of it. People harvest three tomatoes in the garden and give us two of them.

If we look back to the times when there were no armed insurgents, but the junta had already proceeded disproportionately; how did people fight against them back then?

They fought with sticks against machine guns. They quit their jobs, left their families and came to us from everywhere. This concerned those as well, who did ignore the whole thing. Meanwhile, they changed their mind and protected their country. Many changed their bad habits, abstaining from alcohol. Among the insurgents, generally, iron discipline reigns and it is strictly forbidden to drink alcohol. The people are not paid. They fight for an idea. They eat what they are given from the civilians. All are highly motivated, but the sooner the whole thing comes to an end, the better.

What has changed in the towns and villages under control of the insurgents? For example, I read that they close casinos and pursue drug traffickers…

The Ukrainian police fought for 23 years against such phenomena as corruption and drugs, but without success. We have fixed it immediately. Drugs have become the absolute rarity. Something is changing in people’s minds and even alcoholics and drug addicts are changing their habits. In our shops you can buy vodka easily, but nobody does. Addicts tell themselves – maybe as a joke – that they will take no more drugs before victory. Anyway, there are no more drugs.

Within the liberated towns, factories and coal mines are destroyed; there is no work. How can you live there?

We will rebuild it, as we did after the Great Patriotic War. Our enthusiasm will be enough for that. Even if our generation will live in poverty, the next generation will live better. We are not afraid.

From the Russian side you receive humanitarian aid, which is generally known. But who delivers this assistance: the State, any parties, the church, private individuals?

You have access to these packages. Take pictures, the packages are labeled.

In the store for humanitarian aid I’ve seen many packages by the Communist Party, from churches…

Also from veterans of the Afghan war, by Chernobyl veterans, by the Communist Party, from the people who know what a war is like.

Do western organizations also provide humanitarian assistance in South-East?

And how! They deliver mines and projectiles for the Ukrainian army. In this way they help the Ukraine and this assistance helps then to destroy normal people.

So, there is no real humanitarian aid [from the West]?

It does not exist, I’ve never seen any. The same applies for medical help.

Interview Video (English subtitles) – 8:15

Video: Recorded by Fedot Panteleev.  Subtitles by Marcel Sardo

Text: Translated from German by Joerg Braun. Edited by S. Naylor.

 

http://slavyangrad.org/2014/08/18/interview-with-a-rebel-part-1/

 

Reprinted in :
http://www.globalresearch.ca/nazi-safaris-in-ukraine-militiaman-fighting-against-government-forces-speaks-out-some-are-willing-to-pay-to-hunt-insurgents/5396524
Nazi Safaris in Ukraine: Militiaman Fighting Against Government Forces Speaks Out – “Some Are Willing to Pay to Hunt Insurgents”

Russian Strategy in the Face of Anglo-American Imperialism

The Beginning of World Shift

by Thierry Meyssan

Anglo-Saxon agression against Russia is taking the form of financial and economic warfare. However, Moscow is preparing for armed hostilities by developing its agricultural self-sufficency and multiplying its alliances. For Thierry Meyssan, after the creation of the caliphate in the Levant, Washington would lay down a new card in September in St. Petersburg. The ability of Russia to maintain its internal stability will determine the course of events.

Voltaire Network | Damascus (Syria) | 13 August 2014

The offensive led by Anglos-Saxons (USA, UK and Israel) for world domination continues on two lines simultaneously: both the creation of the “Greater Middle East” (Greater Middle East) by attacking simultaneously Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, and separating Russia from the European Union through the crisis they organised in Ukraine.

In this sprint, it seems that Washington wants to impose the dollar as the single currency in the gas market, the energy source of the twenty-first century, the way it imposed it on the oil [1] market. The Western media hardly cover the war in Donbass and their population is ignorant of the scale of the fighting, the US military presence, the number of civilian casualties, the wave of refugees. On the other hand, Western media have a delayed reaction to events in North Africa and the Levant, presenting them either as the result of a so-called “Arab Spring” (that is to say, in practice, a takeover by the Muslim Brotherhood), or as the destructive effect of a civilization which is inherently violent. More than ever, it is necessary to help the Arabs who are incapable of living peacefully in the absence of Western settlers.

Russia is now the leading power capable of leading the resistance to Anglo-Saxon imperialism. It has three tools: BRICS, an alliance of economic rivals who know they can not grow up without one another, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a strategic alliance with China to stabilize Central Asia and finally, the Organization for Collective Security Treaty, a military alliance of former Soviet states.

At the Fortaleza Summit (Brazil), which was held from July 14 to 16, BRICS took the plunge and announced the creation of a monetary reserve fund (mainly Chinese) and a BRICS Bank as alternatives to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the dollar system [2].

Even before this announcement, the Anglo-Saxons had established their answer: the transformation of the Al-Qaeda terrorist network in order to prepare unrest among all Muslim peoples of Russia and China. [3] They continued their offensive in Syria and spilled over the borders both in Iraq and in Lebanon. They failed however to expel part of the Palestinians to Egypt and to destabilize the region even more deeply. Finally, they keep away from Iran to give President Hassan Rohani a chance to weaken the power of the anti-imperialist Khomeinists.

Two days after the announcement of the BRICS, the United States accused Russia of destroying Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over the Donbass, killing 298 people. On this basis, purely arbitrary, they forced the Europeans to enter into economic war against Russia. Situating itself as a court, the Council of the European Union tried and convicted Russia without any evidence and without giving it an opportunity to defend itself. The CEU issued “sanctions” against its financial system.

Recognizing that European leaders are not working for the interests of their people, but for those of the Anglo-Saxons, Russia has gnawed at the bit and refrained from going to war in Ukraine. It supports the insurgents with arms and intelligence, and hosts more than 500,000 refugees, but declines to send troops into the fray. It probably will not happen until the vast majority of Ukrainians revolt against President Poroshenko, even if it does not enter the country until after the fall of the People’s Republic of Donetsk.

Faced with economic warfare, Moscow has chosen to respond with similar measures, but in agriculture, not finance. Two considerations guided this choice: first, short-term, other BRICS can mitigate the consequences of so-called “sanctions”; on the other hand, medium and long term, Russia is preparing for war and intends to completely rebuild its agriculture to go it alone.

Moreover, the Anglo-Saxons have planned to paralyze Russia from within. First by activating, via the Islamic Emirate (EIS), terrorist groups within its Muslim population, and organizing a media challenge in the municipal elections of September 14. Large sums of money have been distributed to all opposition candidates in the thirty largest cities involved, while at least 50,000 Ukrainian agitators, mixed with refugees, are regrouping in St. Petersburg. Most of them have dual Russian citizenship. This is clearly to reproduce at the provincial level protests that followed the elections in Moscow in December 2011 – with the addtition of violence; and engage the country in a color revolution process to which certain officials in the ruling class are favorable.

To do so, Washington has appointed a new ambassador to Russia, John Tefft, who had prepared the “Rose Revolution” in Georgia and the coup in Ukraine.

It will be important for President Vladimir Putin to be able to trust his prime minister, Dmitry Medvedev, whom Washington hoped to recruit to overthrow him.

Considering the imminent danger, Moscow would have been able to convince Beijing to accept the accession of India in exchange for that of Iran (but also those of Pakistan and Mongolia) to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO ). The decision should be published at the summit in Dushanbe (Tajikistan) on September 12 and 13. It should put an end to the conflict which has opposed India and China for centuries and engage them in military cooperation. This reversal, if confirmed, also would end the honeymoon between New Delhi and Washington who was hoping to distance India from Russia in particular by giving access to nuclear technologies. The membership of New Delhi is also a bet on the sincerity of the new Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, despite the suspicion that he encouraged anti-Muslim violence in 2002 in Gujarat when he was the leading Minister.

In addition, the accession of Iran, which is a provocation in the face of Washington, should give the SCO precise knowledge of jihadist movements and ways to counter them. Again, if confirmed, it would reduce Iran’s willingness to negotiate a lull with the “Great Satan” that led it to elect Sheik Hassan Rohani to the presidency. It would be a gamble on the authority of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Indeed, these memberships would mark the beginning of the shift in the world from the West to the East. [4] Still, this trend must be protected militarily. This is the role of the Organization for Collective Security Treaty (CSTO), formed around Russia, but to which China does not belong. Unlike NATO, this organization is a classic alliance, consistent with the Charter of the United Nations since each member retains the option to leave if it wants. So it is based on this freedom that Washington has tried in recent months to buy some members, including Armenia. However, the chaotic situation in Ukraine appears to have cooled those who dreamed of US “protection”.

Tension is likely to increase in the coming weeks.

Thierry Meyssan

Translation Roger Lagasse

 

http://www.voltairenet.org/article185074.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article185053.html — Русский

 

Стратегия России в отношении англосаксонского империализма

Начало эпохи великих перемен

Тьерри Мейсан

Агрессия англосаксов против России принимает форму финансово-экономической войны. Однако Москва готовится и к отражению вооружённой агрессии, стремясь обеспечить продовольственную независимость и множа свои союзы. По мнению Тьерри Мейсана после создания халифата в Леванте Вашингтон должен «побить новую карту» в сентябре в Санкт-Петербурге. Ход дальнейших событий будет зависеть от способности России сохранять внутреннюю стабильность.

Сеть Вольтер | Дамаск (Сирия) | 11 августа 2014

грессия, проводимая англосаксами (Соединённые Штаты, Соединённое Королевство и Израиль) с целью поддержания мирового господства осуществляется одновременно по двум направлениям: созданием «Большого Среднего Востока» (Greater Middle East) с помощью войн в Ираке, Сирии, Ливане и Палестине и отделением России от Европейского Союза с помощью организованного на Украине кризиса.

В этой скоростной гонке Вашингтон, кажется, хочет навязать доллар в качестве единственной валюты на рынке газа – источнике энергии XXI века, как он его навязал на нефтяном рынке [1].

Западные СМИ почти ничего не сообщают о войне на Донбассе и население этих стран ничего не знает о масштабных боях, участии в них американских военных, числе жертв среди гражданского населения, потоке беженцев. Наоборот, западные СМИ с опозданием освещают события в странах Магреба и в Леванте, но представляют их как следствие «арабской весны (то есть, практически, как захват власти «Братьями-мусульманами), либо как разрушительное действие самой по себе стремительно развивающейся цивилизации. Поэтому, как никогда ранее, необходимо придти на помощь арабам, неспособным жить мирно в отсутствие западных колонистов.

Сегодня Россия является главной державой, способной оказать сопротивление англосаксонскому империализму. Она располагает тремя инструментами: БРИКС –союз экономических соперников, способных развиваться только совместно, Шанхайская Организация сотрудничества – стратегический альянс с Китаем по стабилизации Центральной Азии и, наконец, Организация Договора о коллективной безопасности – военный союз бывших советских республик.

На встрече в верхах в Форталеза (Бразилия), проходившей с 14 по 16 июля, страны БРИКС отважились на создание валютного резервного фонда (в основном китайского) и Банка БРИКС в качестве альтернативы Международному валютному фонду и мировому Банку, то есть всей долларовой системе [2].

Эти меры были приняты в ответ на преобразование англосаксами террористической Аль Каиды в халифат с целью посеять смуту среди мусульманского населения России и Китая [3]. Своё наступление они начали в Сирии, а затем продолжили в Ираке и Ливане. Но им не удалось изгнать часть населения Палестины в Египет и ещё глубже дестабилизировать весь регион. К тому же они обходят стороной Иран, предоставляя президенту Хассану Рохани возможность ослабить антиимпериалистическое движение хомейнистов.

Через два дня после заявления БРИКС, Соединённые Штаты обвинили Россию в уничтожении гражданского самолёта MH17 компании Malaysia Airlines над Донбассом и гибели 298 человек. На этом основании и по собственному произволу они вынудили европейцев вступить в экономическую войну с Россией. Не обладая судебными полномочиями, Совет Европейского Союза осудил и вынес России приговор, не дав ей возможности защищаться. Он объявил санкции против её финансовой системы.

Сознавая, что руководители европейских стран не служат интересам своих народов, а лишь интересам англосаксов, Россия, сжав зубы, так и не вступила в войну на Украине. Она поддерживает повстанцев вооружениями и разведданными, а также предоставила убежище более чем 500 000 беженцев, но воздерживается направлять туда войска и не хочет попасть в переплёт. Вероятно, она не будет вмешиваться до тех пор, пока подавляющее большинство украинцев не восстанет против президента Порошенко, и, возможно, не войдёт в эту страну, даже если падёт Донецкая народная республика.

В объявленной ей экономической войне Москва отвечает симметричными мерами, но они касаются только сельхозпродукции, а не финансов. Этот выбор обусловлен двумя соображениями: с одной стороны, в краткосрочном плане страны БРИКС могут временно ослабить последствия так называемых «санкций»; с другой стороны, в средне срочном и долгосрочном плане Россия готовится к войне и намерена полностью перестроить свое сельскохозяйственное производство и стать самодостаточной.

Кроме того англосаксы сделали всё для того, чтобы взорвать Россию изнутри. Прежде всего, с помощью Исламского Государства они создали террористические группировки из числа мусульманского населения, а после этого намерены организовать с помощью СМИ массовые протесты в период муниципальных выборов 14 сентября. Всем кандидатам от оппозиции в тридцати крупных городах выделены значительные суммы денег, а 50 000 украинских агитаторов, внедрённых в состав беженцев, группируются в Санкт-Петербурге. Большинство из них имеют двойное гражданство. Очевидно, речь идёт об организации в провинции демонстраций и беспорядков, подобных тем, которые были проведены в Москве во время выборов в декабре 2011 года, и вовлечении страны в процесс цветной революции, которую приветствует часть чиновников и некоторые представители правящего класса.

С этой целью Вашингтон направил в Россию нового посла Джона Теффта, который готовил «революцию роз» в Грузии и государственный переворот на Украине.

Для президента Владимира Путина важно заручиться поддержкой Премьер-министра Дмитрия Медведева, с помощью которого Вашингтон намеревался его свергнуть.

Наре́ндра Мо́ди

Считая опасность неминуемой, Москва, возможно, убедит Пекин согласиться с вступлением Индии вместо Ирана (а также Пакистана и Монголии) в Шанхайскую организацию сотрудничества (ШОС). Об этом решении по-видимому будет объявлено на саммите, который состоится в Душанбе (Таджикистан) 12 и 13 сентября. Оно должно положить конец конфликту, длящемуся в течение нескольких веков между Китаем и Индией, и вовлечь их в венное сотрудничество. Этот поворот, если он состоится, завершит также медовый месяц для Нью-Дели и Вашингтона, который рассчитывал дистанцировать Индию от России, предоставляя ей доступ к ядерным технологиям. Вступление Нью-Дели явится также подтверждением искренности для нового Премьер-министра Наренджа Моди, над которым нависло подозрение в поддержке антимусульманских выступлений в 2002 году в Гуджарате, где он был в то время Главным министром.

Али Хаменеи

Кроме всего прочего, вступление Ирана, которое для Вашингтона представляется провокационным, должно обеспечить ШОС точной информацией о джихадистских движениях и средствах противодействия им. Так что, если это подтвердится, желание у Ирана продолжать переговоры с «Великим Сатаной», который способствовал избранию президентом шейха Хассана Рохани, поубавится. Вступление в ШОС Ирана стало бы также подтверждением власти верховного лидера исламской революции аятоллы Али Хаменеи.

По факту, новые вступления в ШОС ознаменуют собой начало смены ролей Запада и Востока [4]. Остаётся только, чтобы такой ход событий был подкреплён военной силой. Эта задача возложена на Организацию Договора коллективной безопасности ( ОДКБ), во главе с Россией, но Китай не входит в неё. В отличие от НАТО эта организация представляет собой обычный альянс, отвечающий принципам Хартии ООН, поскольку каждый член сохраняет возможность выйти из неё, если захочет. Опираясь на эту свободу, Вашингтон попытался в течение нескольких последних месяцев подкупить некоторых членов, в частности, Армению. Однако ситуация неопределённости на Украине, кажется, остудила тех, кто мечтал об американской «протекции».

Поэтому не исключено, что напряжённость на протяжении ближайших недель будет расти.

Тьерри Мейсан

Перевод Эдуард Феоктистов

http://www.voltairenet.org/article185053.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article185074.html English

 

There will be Maidan in St Petersburg – Evgeny Fedorov — русский

Russian politician and deputy of the State Duma, Evgeny Fedorov, describes how Russia will be targeted next, published August 3, 2014.

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”//www.youtube.com/embed/WNAPbuwLMHg” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen>

Subtitles in English, French, German

http://youtu.be/WNAPbuwLMHg

 

Additional information: http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-sponsored-color-revolution-in-russia-in-st-petersburg/5398132

Сводки от ополчения Новороссии

http://vk.com/strelkov_info?w=wall-57424472_13321
http://vk.com/strelkov_info

Интервью с Алексеем Мозговым. “Свобода плюс совесть. Это и будет Новороссия”, 21.08.14
English translation:
http://slavyangrad.org/2014/08/29/alexei-mozgovoi-freedom-and-conscience-this-will-be-novorossia/
Interview with Alexej Mozgovoi, August 21, 2014
“Если вести речь об операциях, которые довелось проводить моему подразделению, то оговорюсь, что само слово “операция” слишком громко. Война сейчас идёт в основном на информационном поле. А боевые действия как таковые — попросту дополнение. Украине важнее информационно задавить идею, которую мы отстаиваем. А с помощью оружия уже и уничтожить людей, у которых она в головах.
Мы раньше по структуре и личному составу (а у нас есть шахтёры, таксисты, колхозники) были батальоном, теперь переросли в бригаду.
Собственно, то, что мы разрабатываем, и операциями назвать нельзя. Хотя мы работаем с картами, с разведкой, работаем по тому штатному расписанию, которое должно быть в войсковых частях. Выясняем, где находится подразделение, где грузы, где какая колонна перемещается.
Мы сменили изначальную тактику. Наша ошибка была в том, что мы восприняли эту войну как чистую борьбу. А Украина чисто воевать не то что не умеет, а даже не желает. Им что? Есть ракетные установки, есть “Грады”, “Ураганы”, “Смерчи”, почему их не использовать? Они и бьют из них. При этом называют свою операцию АТО — антитеррористическая. Но где, в какой стране против терроризма целый фронт воевал бы?
Я понимаю борьбу с терроризмом как локальное мероприятие, спецоперацию. Террористов уничтожили — всё. А эта война идёт полгода, и со временем становится всё жестче, кровавее.Вот несколько ситуаций, в которых было задействовано моё подразделение. Начну с неудачных — оборона Лисичанска. На подавление наших сил Украина бросила 11 тыс. человек личного состава. Неудачна она была в том плане, что тогда мы ещё не сменили тактику, выставляли чистый фронт, блокпосты. И это
 было ошибкой.
Эта война со стороны укров вся построена на обмане: начиная от новостей и заканчивая боем. И из-за того, что мы были настроены на честную борьбу, мы несли потери. Я отношусь к потере личного состава очень остро. Для меня потеря и нескольких человек — большой удар.
Да, мы побеждали в некоторых боях, мы отталкивали врагов, они отступали. Но потом они подтягивали всё больше вооружения, всё больше живой силы. Вот яркий пример. Был у них блокпост на Старой Краснянке, это между Кременным и Рубежной. Мы отрабатывали его раз 10-ть. Сегодня уничтожаем, а завтра утром там стоят новые люди. Сегодня уничтожаем — завтра утром — новые
люди. Укры вывозят трупы “Камазами”, тут же завозят новый личный состав. И назавтра они будут трупами.
Складывается впечатление, что личный состав не информируется о том, что происходит. Вновь прибывшие не знают, куда подевались люди с этого блокпоста. Приходят весёлые, не знающие, что их ждёт. О чём они думают в тот момент, непонятно. Ведь явно следы побоища: в “Камазах”, в которых трупы вывозят, кровь течёт, да и везде следы крови. А ведь эти новые силы — ни в чём не повинные люди, которых заставляют идти в ряды Вооружённых сил Украины под угрозой: не пойдёшь на войну, сядешь на 7 лет. Они не в состоянии соизмерить жизнь и 7 лет в тюрьме. Идут на войну в надежде выжить.Тактика украинских войск заключается в том, что они полностью возложили груз войны на артиллерию и ракетные установки. Сейчас они сначала проводят зачистку территории с помощью “Града”, САУ.
Они говорят: точечные удары. Но точечный удар огромной площади получается, зачищается вся территория. Затем проходят танки, если кто-то где-то остался, добивают танками. Только потом личный состав на БТРах выходит на зачистку.
Казалось бы, эта тактика неодолимая. Но потому мы и сменили свою тактику. Хотя у нас и увеличилось количество людей, но я их не выставляю в лобовую. Работают разведгруппы, диверсионные группы: ушли, увидели, отработали, вернулись. Всё. Мы работаем у них на коммуникациях, работаем на доставках и складах вооружения. Не будет у них складов вооружения, не будет и возможности бомбить.
Буквально вчера мне положили донесение, что уничтожена колонна из 10 “Уралов”, которые доставляли в сторону Донецка снаряды для “Градов”. Что может быть эффективнее? Даже если есть эти установки, без снарядов они будут стоять мёртвым грузом, грудой железа. Бьём из РПГ, “Шмелей”.По специальности я — художественный руководитель, дирижёр духовых оркестров, но до войны не работал по профессии. Строителем работал, бригадиром. Сейчас миномётной батареей руковожу — и тоже трубами. Так сложилось.
С детства мечтал стать военным. Был у нас министр обороны Кузьмук при Кучме, царство коррупции набирало такие обороты, что ужас. И у меня не получилось ни поступить, ни выпуститься.
Главное сейчас — чтобы выжило максимальное количество личного состава. Потому что именно эти люди, которые сейчас в строю, являются носителями народовластия. Именно они могут стать базисом всего того, за что сражаемся. Поэтому их сейчас и стараются уничтожить, что именно эти люди могут построить ту власть, которая необходима. И я старюсь их беречь.
Думаю, Новороссия будет республикой — обязательно в составе России. Я за то, чтобы на территории Новороссии создать образец той власти, которая нужна всем. И уже отталкиваясь от того, что получится у нас, можно было бы регулировать, направлять, что-то корректировать и дальше распространять по другим регионам. На сегодняшний день не только на Украине и в России, да и по всему миру кризис власти.
Но одно дело – мечтать об идеале власти, сидя в кафе и моделируя эту власть из прочитанных книг, и другое дело – завоёвывать её в боях, получить разрушенную территорию, когда модель власти откладывается на завтра, а вступает в действие в мобилизационный момент сверхцентрализм военный…
Командиры консолидируются между собой. Есть координирующий центр, ведётся штабная работа. На данный момент все пазлы сложились в одну картинку: есть единый штаб, военный совет, есть связь между командирами. Она распространяется на обе области — Луганскую и Донецкую, и на военном уровне они слились. Бывают совещания командиров подразделений, а собрать
всё подразделение в одном месте — это чревато последствиями. Люди сейчас все рассредоточены по разным гарнизонам. Чем запутаннее мы будем себя вести, чем меньше будем в одном месте собираться, тем надёжнее, тем больше у нас будет шансов выжить, а это сейчас главное.
Званий в бригаде нет. Есть комбриг, замы комбрига, есть начальник штаба, комбаты, есть должность командира отделения, зампотыла, начмед, начальник связи, штатная структура, она наполнена людьми. Большая её часть — это вчерашние рабочие, которые искренне хотят сражаться. Даже если останется только штат штаба, он покажет немало.
Доминируюшая фигура — Игорь Стрелков. И он должен быть не только доминирующей, а единой. Я изначально пришёл именно к нему и встал в его строй. Его идея сходится с моей. И он действительно за идею борется.
Как эту идею сформулировать? За совесть. Совесть прежде всего должна быть у человека, честь и достоинство. Справедливость. Всё остальное — многословность, многоточие. Главное, чтобы совесть у человека была. И желательно чистая.
Она же постоянно подвержена испытаниям. А война — это вообще постоянное испытание совести. Война — лакмусовая бумажка. Проявляется на ней каждый человек — от рядового до генерала.
Определённые встряски для нашего общества полезны, потрясения нужны. Но война — плохо.
Вот были на Майдане события, и шли разговоры, что западные украинцы — пылкие люди. А Юго-Восток — сонные русские люди, огонь в них потух. А вот Юго-Восток загорелся, пламя мощное полыхнуло.
На Майдане выступали против олигархии, против чиновников продажных. Идея хорошая. И когда они там за правду плясали, мы ходили на работу. Исходя из того результата, что они наплясали, они поменяли шило на мыло, а то и хуже. Во власти не просто ничего не поменялось, а ухудшилось: те же олигархи, те же продажные депутаты и чиновники, те же лица, которые торгуют государственностью и людьми в том государстве направо-налево. Что поменялось? И вдруг люди идут их защищать! Это поражает. Не устаю удивляться нашему народу. Сейчас ведь должны бы бороться против тех, кто их направляет на эту войну. Но они за них погибают. Тогда в чём был смысл Майдана? В чём? Зачем этот кровавый спектакль устраивать, который привёл только к ухудшению, а не конструктивным действиям? Такое поведение — результат пропаганды тотальной.
Политруков отменили в своё время. В украинской армии из политруков сделали воспитателей. Грубо говоря, политических вопросов никаких не поднималось, просто состояние психологическое человека поддерживалось на определенном уровне. Даже в армии, получается, перекрыли путь патриотизму. Хотя это единственный орган власти, который на патриотизме и должен стоять.
В моей бригаде, к сожалению, нет политорганов. Тяжело создать из колхозника и рабочего войсковое подразделение в том виде, в котором мы привыкли его видеть. А тем более создать именно ту структуру, которая должна быть… Специалистов нет. Всё это в основном на меня ложится. Есть информационный центр бригады, который занимается и снабжением информацией бригады, и информацию из бригады передаёт на “большую землю”, скажем так.
Информацию мы получаем через интернет. Но укры стараются нас отрезать от мира. Связи не бывает по 3 дня, то интернета нет.
Мы постоянно меняем дислокацию. Зона ответственности такова: по городам передняя линия — это Первомайск, по флангам это Артёмовск и Дебальцево, именно та трасса, по которой укры передвигаются вниз, и Весёлая — Тарасовка-Лутугино.
С продовольствием у нас проблемы. Пустые прилавки. Но вот мы обнаружили в городе склады, где мясо, рыба, курятина… Но почему-то это на прилавки не попало. Склад принадлежит одному предпринимателю. Мы изъяли. Это всё роздано по детским садам, приютам и малоимущим. А для нас продовольствие — то, что соберёт население: наше и население России, отдельные личности, которые говорят: вот я даю, но вы не светите меня. И всякая помощь нам дорога.
Борьба, безусловно, будет продолжаться. Самое главное, чтобы хватало духа. Духа, стремления и надежды на правду, на победу. Если это всё останется в нашем человеке, мы победим. Да, есть Луганск, Донецк, но территория Новороссии — не только эти два города. Территория Новороссии огромна, думаю, она нам поможет очень хорошо.
Усталость от войны наблюдается именно у мирных жителей. Они буквально через неделю-две с начала войны уже кричали: мы от неё устали. Я задаю вопрос: а как бы вы реагировали, если бы война была сейчас Вторая мировая? Деды ваши воевали, годами не вылезая из окопов. Они не уставали? Вы только услышали выстрелы, узнали в новостях, что где-то кого-то убили, уже устали. Сегодня практически та же война, воюем с тем же фашизмом.
А тех, которые сражаются, не устали, иногда еле удерживаю, надо попридержать, чтобы избежать жертв, потерь. Те, которые стоят на линии огня, готовы драться до последнего.Шахтёры идут в ополчение слабо. Были разговоры, что если шахтёры поднимутся, Киева не будет. шапками закидаем… На данный период они до сих пор в шахты на работу ездят. Под Лисичанском мы когда стояли, украми был нанесён артудар по одной из шахт — Кривольнянской. Была ночь, и там работала ночная смена. Все люди там чуть не погибли. Но на следующий день они пошли туда на работу!
Второй случай. Другая территория, юг — Свердловск. Автобус с шахтёрами: женщины, мужчины, — был расстрелян с блокпоста укров. Просто расстреляли! Неизвестно ведь украм, кто едет, — расстреляли. А люди ехали на работу. У меня именно к этим людям вопрос: как, о чём человек в данный момент думает, когда он проезжает мимо стреляющих, воюющих? Он думает о работе, о куске сала? О чём? Идёт война, тебя убивают! Гражданские люди, которые идут на работу, идут как овечки на бойню, даже не сопротивляясь!
Страх потерять работу? “А чем я буду кормить семью?” Но чем кормятся семьи ополченцев, которые тебя защищают, чем кормятся их дети? Да, сейчас трудно, очень трудно, но они понимают, что в данный момент необходимо попризабыть про хороший борщ, хорошо накрытый стол. Хоть что-то на столе — достаточно. Главное — выжить и победить, доказать, что мы не стадо, как Тимошенко говорит — биомасса, а мы люди, личности. Мы — люди, умеющие потребовать от власти то, что она когда-то нам обещала.В бригаде есть герои, есть героически павшие. Героизм в основном проявляет поколение, которое застало все эти фильмы старые, книжки, рассказы дедушек, бабушек. У них это в крови: если не я, то кто? Я должен, и всё.
Сейчас в госпитале лежит командир первого взвода Владимир. Героическая личность, награждён медалью “За боевые заслуги”. Благодаря его самоотверженности, выжил его взвод, уцелело другое подразделение, которому он дал приказ отойти от наступающих танков. И он один остался. У нас был самодельный броневичок под названием “комбат”, сами его обшили бронёй, поставили на него вооружение. Владимир остался в нём, вёл бой. Один! До тех пор, пока не ушли другие подразделения. Прикрывал.
В итоге попадает снаряд в этот “комбат”, ему отрывает руку, он теряет сознание. Во время удара место разрыва руки было обожжено. В результате взрыва рана обожглась, кровь спеклась, и кровотечения практически не было.
Через некоторое время Владимир приходит в себя, видит, что рука оторвана, но висит на коже. Он руку кладёт в китель, на пуговицы застегнулся и пошёл. Сутки пробирался. Один! Вышел из окружения. Миновал все посты! Из боекомплекта у него остался один патрон в ПМе на случай, если понадобится: правая рука висит в кителе, в левой — ПМ. Спасти руку не получилось.
Ещё эпизод проявления мужества личного состава. Один из первых боёв в Лисичанске. Когда были ещё блокпосты. У нас парень, Дима, в самом начале  боевых действий погиб. Но благодаря его сообразительности, сноровке и самоотверженности уцелело много людей. Он принял весь огонь укров на себя. Весь. Когда подразделение только прибыло с марша, помогали на Яндовском блокпосту — отстаивать, надо было начать бой. В момент, пока все только рассредотачивались, Дима принял на себя огонь, поразил цель. И первым был уничтожен. Но благодаря ему остальные выжили. Они не просто продолжали бой, они отодвинули укров, а блокпост, что те занимали, уничтожили. Всё благодаря тому, что один человек себя не пожалел, когда это необходимо было.
Мы должны быть такими — витязями, героями, потому что мы русские, мы славяне, мы другими не имеем права быть.
Из вооружения есть ПЗРК и ЗАУ спаренные, по самолётам работаем. Но укры после того, как поняли, что мы можем их отрабатывать, сменили тактику: они не снижаются на ту высоту, которую можно взять зенитной установкой, а заходят с большой высоты и сбрасывают приличного диаметра бомбы площадные. Две-три сбросил и улетел.Укры заявляют, что они борются с террористами, а при этом идёт бомбёжка мирного, ни в чём не повинного населения, уничтожают целые кварталы города, инфраструктура. Всё! Как так?! Если вы воюете с нами, воюйте с нами. Но они начинают бомбить города, потом заявляют, что это наших рук дело… Каким образом? Есть доказательство, чем бомбили, с какой стороны. Траекторию полёта можно вычислить по той же воронке. Но идут наглые заявления, что это не они, а мы.
Прежде считалось, что такого рода война: с полевыми командирами, гражданская война, — это стихия. Её трудно организовать, создать структуру общую. Элемент вольности, самостийности есть. Тяжело удержать в руках. Да, иногда приходится и прикрикнуть, когда за рамки выходит человек, наказать, допустим, в карцер посадить. Всякое войсковое соединение всегда имело гауптвахту, не без этого.
Но у нас же все в основном на позиции одной идеи: если мы хотим чего-то добиться, нужна дисциплина. И это изначально повелось, когда нас всего один взвод был. Ещё до начала боевых действий я начал формировать народное ополчение, потому что видел, что это необходимо, чтобы народ был как-то подготовлен. И уже тогда мы решили, что нам главное — дойти до конечной цели, то есть победить. А остальное — кто был прав, кто виноват — потом будем решать. Выстроилась определённая структура, и все ей подчинены.
Борьба когда начиналась, такой категории, как Новороссия, не существовало. Это понятие возникло в ходе сражений и постепенно всё больше и больше разрастается, и приобретает всё больше смыслов. Сейчас Новороссия — это не просто территория, это прежде всего идея. Свобода и совесть — это и будет Новороссия”.

Alexei Mozgovoi: Freedom and Conscience: this will be Novorossia !

This is one report on the militias fighting the Ukrainian army. He reports that men are forced into service in the Ukrainian Army, up to 60 years of age, threatened with 7 years in prison if they refuse.

This is a powerful interview.

http://slavyangrad.org/2014/08/29/alexei-mozgovoi-freedom-and-conscience-this-will-be-novorossia/

Interview with Alexej Mozgovoi, August 21, 2014

Translator: Maria Razdiak Edited by S. Naylor

“If we were to speak of the operations which my unit carried out, I must caution: the word “operations” is an exaggeration. Currently, the war is mainly being fought in the media field: an information war. The actual military activity is merely an extension. It is of utmost importance, for Ukraine, to destroy the idea for which we stand and the weapons merely aid the physical destruction of the people who carry these ideals in their hearts.

“We used to be, by structure and organization (by accumulating miners, taxi-drivers, farmers in our ranks), a battalion. Now we’ve grown into a brigade.

“In actuality, that which we had been engaging in is difficult to call an “operation” per se. This is despite the fact that we work with maps, organize reconnaissance, and abide by staff timetables, as required in a military unit. We locate the whereabouts of the enemy units, of materiel, and of the movements of the enemy.

“We have altered our original tactics. The main flaw of the initial design was the fact that we viewed this war as purely a physical struggle, whereas the Ukraine forces are not only incapable of fighting clean but also do not desire to. What does it matter to them? They have rocket launchers; they have Grads, Uragans, Smerches – why not use them? And they do. Also they call their operation the ATO – ‘Anti–Terrorist Operation’. But where, in what country, does an entire army fight against terrorism?

“In my understanding, a fight with terrorism is a localized measure, a special operation. Once you destroy the terrorists, you are done. But this war has already lasted six months, and is gradually becoming harsher and bloodier with every passing day.

“Here are the outlines of a few situations in which my unit has participated. I will start with the failures – the defence of Lisichansk. To suppress our forces, Ukraine threw eleven thousand men at us. Our lack of success was characterised by the fact that we were still true to the original tactics – the tactics of a clean fight: creating a clear front, setting up checkpoints. That was a mistake. This war, constructed by Ukies, is built on deceit: from the news to the battlefield; and because we were expecting a clean fight, we suffered casualties. I feel the loss of my men, most severely. For me, a loss of even a few individuals is a painful blow.

“Yes, we have won fights; we pushed the enemy and they have retreated, but they always returned, in greater numbers, with more weaponry. Here is a shining example of this pattern. They set up a checkpoint at Staraya Krasnyanka, between Kremennoye and Rybezhnoye. We worked it over ten times. One day we destroy it; the next morning it is already manned with new people. Today – destroy, tomorrow morning – new people. Ukies load up Kamaz trucks with corpses and straight away, bring in new personnel – new men destined to become corpses the following day.

“One gets the impression that their personnel are not informed about what is happening. The newcomers do not know what happened to their predecessors. They arrive uplifted, ignorant of their future. What they think about at the time of arrival is a mystery. They are surrounded by the clear signs of a recent struggle: the transport, the checkpoint, everything stained a dirty crimson. Those fresh forces are blameless people; obligated into service, and threatened with prison. If you don’t join the military, you’ll spend 7 years locked-up. They are incapable of putting aside life for 7 years. They go to war, hoping to survive.

“The tactics of the Ukrainian army can be summed up in this: they have placed the full weight of war upon the artillery and the rocket launchers. They commence an attack with a purge of territory, which they do using Grads and self-propelled artillery systems.

“They call it targeted attacks but the outcomes of such attacks are huge areas, whole squares swept “clean”. Afterwards, the tanks arrive with means to destroy in case anyone is left alive somewhere. Finally, their armoured personnel carriers follow, manned with soldiers to finish up. It seems like their tactics are unbeatable. That is the reason why we’ve changed our own tactics.

“Even though we have grown in numbers, I refuse to send men into the open. We prefer to work in saboteur-reconnaissance groups (“SRG”): they went, they saw, they worked, and they returned. That’s all. We work on their communications; we work on their distributions and their ammunition warehouses. If they don’t have ammo, they don’t have the ability to fire.

“Only yesterday I was informed about the destruction of a column of 10 Urals trucks that were delivering the missiles for the Grads, which were headed toward Donetsk. What can be more effective? Even if they have the launchers, without the shells those are simply piles of scrap metal, ballast. We hit them with RPGs and “Shmels” grenade launchers.

“My original profession was in the creative field. I was a conductor of a wind (brass) orchestra but, even before the war, I didn’t work in that field. I worked as a builder, as a brigadier. Now, I’m in charge of a mortar battery – also a wind “instrument”. That’s life.

“From early childhood I dreamed of being a military man. Back then, we had a Defence Minister called Kuzmuk; he was part of Kuchma’s government. The levels of corruption in the army had reached head-spinning hights and I failed to get into the Academy.

“The main thing now is to allow for the maximum survival of our troops. Because it is these men, spread among the units, who carry the Will of the People. Because it is these men who can become the basis, the pillars, of everything we fight for, that is the reason why these men are targets: they can create a government, an administration of the People, a collaborative force, They are absolutely essential to our future and because of that I am desperate to protect them.

“I think that Novorossiya will be a Republic – an autonomous part of Russia. I stand for the creation of the exemplary governance that is required, within the sovereign Republic of Novorossiya. Taking that as a foundation for future regulation and direction, correction and distribution among the other regions; for currently it is not only Ukraine and Russia that are suffering from a political crisis, but the whole world.

“It is one thing to wish for an ideal government, while sitting in a café and modelling such from reading books, but it is another thing when —in order to win it in battle and to conquer destroyed territory— the ideal government model must take a step back, delayed into the future, to allow room for the necessary, super-centralised, military present.

“The commanders act in unison. There is a coordinating centre, Headquarters. At this moment in time, all the puzzle pieces have come together: there is a single control centre, a Council of War, and good, secure, communications among the commanders. The same picture is held true for both regions, Lugansk and Donetsk; and it has united the military. Occasionally, the unit commanders meet up, but combining all the units in one place might have dire consequences. Currently, our people are dotted throughout different garrisons. The more complex and confusing are our actions, the more spread out we are, the greater are the chances of our survival, which is presently the main objective.

“There are now ranks in a brigade. We have Brigade Commanders, Deputy Brigade Commanders, Heads of Units and Battalion Commanders; we have Squad Leaders, a Logistics Deputy, Head of Medical, Head of Communications. The whole staff structure is filled with real people. The majority of them were yesterday’s labourers who truly want to fight. If all we are left with is one single unit, we will still have a lot to show.

“The dominating figure is Igor Strelkov. He must be not only dominating, but unique. I came to him when it all started and stood under his command. His ideal is identical to mine and he honestly fights for it.

“How can I formulate that idea? Conscience. That is what a human must have, a conscience. Honour and dignity; virtue. Righteousness. All else is just chatter. The main thing is to have a conscience; preferably, a spotless one. It is that conscience, which is constantly tested and tempted by war – it is a constant trial of conscience, of virtue. War is a litmus paper. Every person is clearly seen for what they are, be it a private or a general.

“Certain shocks to our society are necessary, healthy even. But war is bad.

“The events of the Maidan have prompted talks: the western Ukrainians are passionate people. The South-Eastern people are sluggish and sleepy Russians – their fire extinguished. But, it is in the South-East, where we are suddenly flaming – the fire is scorching and blinding.

“Maidan chanted against Oligopoly and against the corrupt officials,; a Great notion. While they danced for the truth, we went to work, earning a living. The result of their “dance” was pain. They went from the frying pan into the fire. The government didn’t just change, it went from bad to worse: the same Oligarchs, the same corrupt ministers and officials, the same stale faces, selling power, influence and people, which they were obliged to guide and protect. What changed? Suddenly the same people were marching to protect the government! That is absurd, strikingly so. I cannot put away the amazement at my own nation. They should be fighting against the people who have pushed them into this war but, instead, they are dying for them.

“What was the point of Maidan? What was it? Why orchestrate this bloody spectacle, which only worsened the situation, as an alternative to some sort of constructive action? This behaviour is the result of totalitarian propaganda.

“The rank of Political Commander (“Politruk”) was made obsolete sometime ago. In the Ukrainian army ‘politruks’ became educators. In the most basic of terms: no political questions were raised, no political direction was given; only the psychological state of the enlisted was kept at a certain level. Even in the army, it turns out, blocked the path of patriotism although it is the only authority on which patriotism should stand .

“Regrettably, my brigade lacks Politorgans ( Political Organisation?). It’s hard to create a conventional military unit from a farmer and a builder. But –even with a desperate lack of specialists– to create the exact system as it should be, has turned into my task. We have a brigade information centre, which collects and distributes information to and from the “great land”, so to say.

“We get the information from the internet but the Ukies are constantly attempting to cut us off. Both mobile and satellite communications disappear for days at a time. We are constantly changing our location. Our area of responsibility is in the front line on the flanks of the Pervomajsk, Artemovsk and Debaltsevo, the precise track that the Ukies follow down, and Veselaja – Tarasovka-Lutugino.

“We have problems with our provisions. The market stalls may be empty, but we’ve located warehouses within the city, filled with meat, fish, and poultry which, for some strange reason, failed to make it into the shops. It turns out, the warehouses belong to the same owner. We confiscated the contents. All of it has been given away, to kindergartens, orphanages and the needy. For us, food is what unites our people: our Russian populations, and by separate individuals who give but ask that they not be mentioned. We are thankful for everything we get.

“The struggle will most definitely continue. The main thing now is to keep our spirit – the spirit of committment, the aspiration and the hope for truth and victory. If our people keep all three, we will be victorious. Yes, we have Lugansk and Donetsk, but the territory of Novorossia is not just these two cities. The territory of Novorossia is huge; I believe, it will aid us greatly.

“There is war weariness among civilians. After the first couple of weeks of war, they were already screaming “we are tired of it!” I ask the question “How would you have reacted if this were the Second World War? Your grandfathers fought, spending years in the trenches. Were they not tired? You just heard shots fired, watched the news of someone’s death, and you are already tired.” Today, it is virtually the same war, fighting the same Fascism.

“The men that are in combat, they are not tired. Sometimes, I even struggle to hold them back, hoping to avoid needless deaths and casualties. The men, who stand in the line of fire, are ready to fight to the last.

“The miners have been slow to join the resistance. There is talk, that if the miners would rise, Kiev would disappear… But, for the time being, most of them still go down into the mines. Back when we stood near Lisichansk, the Ukies fired upon one of the mines – Krivoljanskaja. It was night and the night-shift was down there. All of them almost died. But the next day, they all came back, to work!!!

“Another story… Another area south of Sverdlovsk. A bus full of miners, men and women, was shot at from a Ukrainian block-post. Just shot at! The Ukies didn’t know who was aboard, they just shot at those people who were going to work. I have a question for those people: “What do you think about, driving past the war and the shooting?” Do they think about work, about a slice of bacon? About what? There is a war on; they are killing you! Civilians, going to work like sheep into a slaughter house, not even resisting!

“Is it the fear of losing a job? “How will I feed the family?” But, what do the families of the resistance eat? What do the children of the men that protect you, eat? Yes, it’s difficult now, very difficult, but they understand that it’s time to forget about an excellent borsht, a well-laid table. If there is something on the table – that’s enough. The main thing is to endure and to win, to prove that we are not a herd, not a biomass (as Timoshenko stated), but that we are people, individuals. We are people; we are ready to hold the government true to their promises.

“In the brigade are heroes; there are the heroically fallen. Heroism is most evident among the generation which caught all those old movies, books, and tales of grandfathers and grandmothers. It’s in their blood: if not me, then who? I must, and that’s all.

“Right now, the Commander of the first platoon of Vladimir lies in hospital. He’s a heroic individual, awarded with a medal “For Military Merit”. Thanks to his dedication and utter disregard of self, his troop survived. Another unit also survived following Vladimir’s orders to retreat from approaching tanks while he remained. Alone. We had a hand-made personnel carrier that we nicknamed “Combat”. We sewed it up with armaments, armoured it with a gun. Vladimir remained inside, fighting – alone! – holding back the enemy; covering his troops until they retreated to safety.

“Eventually a shell hit “Combat” and ripped his arm from his body. He passed out. At the time of impact, the wound was burned. Thus, the wound was cauterized: there was hardly any bleeding. After some time, Vladimir regained consciousness and noticed that his arm was torn off, hanging by a thread of skin. He took the arm and put it into his coat, buttoned up and started walking. 24 hours, he walked. Alone! He managed to escape from the surrounding forces – avoided all enemy posts! From all the weapons, he had a Makarov with a single bullet, just in case. The right arm was tucked into the coat; the left held a gun. The severed limb was not saved.

“Another episode of courage: One of the first battles in Lisichansk back when we had block-posts. We had a guy, Dima, who was killed right at the beginning of the military action. Thanks to his acuteness, proficiency and self-sacrifice, many survived. He took the whole Ukie fire – all the guns turned on him. All of them. Once the unit had arrived from the march, it was necessary to start helping to hold the Jandovskij block-post. While everyone was still getting into position, at that moment Dima hit the target causing the enemy to fire upon himself and he was the first to be killed. Because of his actions, the others survived. Not only did they continue the fight but they managed to push the Ukies back, destroying the block-post they had occupied. All due to the sacrifice of one man.

“This is who we must be – heroes, knights. Because we are Russian, we are Slavs, we cannot be anything else. We do not have the right to be anything else.

“From the weapons we hold – MANPADS and paired ZAUs (automatic anti-aircraft guns) – we work the planes. But the Ukies, once they figured out that we can get them, changed tactics; they don’t descend to the height where we can hit them, but drop bombs from far above, of a massive size. They drop two or three, and disappear.

“The Ukies claim to be fighting terrorism, while bombarding peaceful, innocent civilians, destroying whole city blocks and infrastructure. All of it! How is that?! If you are at war with us, fight us. But instead, they bombard cities and blame it on us… How? We have proof of the bombings: the weapons used and the directions from which the fire came. The flight trajectory can be calculated from the remaining crater. But, there is no arguing their impudent allegations; the unfounded, falsified fault.

“Before, it was commonly believed that such a war with field commanders, a civil war, is a disaster. It is difficult to organise, to create a common structure. Uncontrollable elementary forces, liberties. are impossible to control. Yes, sometimes you have to shout, punish, and send men into lock-up, once a certain line is crossed. Every military establishment has its own breaches but we are bound together by the same idea, united by a common belief. If we want to accomplish anything, we must be disciplined and structured. That stayed with us from the beginning – from that very first unit we formed. Even before the military attacks commenced, I began to organize a resistence of the People because I could see that it was necessary to be ready. Even then, we agreed that we must reach our final aim – we must be victorious. The rest, as to who was right and who was to blame, we’ll let time decide. A clear structure has formed, and all are true to it.

“The fight began when such categories as Novorossia, did not exist. This concept arose in the course of battles and gradually grows more and more, and gains more meanings. Now Novorossia is not just a territory, it is primarily an idea. Liberty and Conscience is and will be the new Russia “.

 

Organ Harvesting in Ukraine Goes Unreported

New Eastern Outlook, 7-9-14
By Tony Cartalucci

Unlike the terrorist offenses in Libya, Syria, and now Iraq, backed by the United States, the UK, the EU, members of NATO as well as regional collaborators such as Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Qatar, where any attempts to stop extremists from seizing entire nations is met by the West’s howling indignation and accusations of “human rights abuses,” the unmitigated brutality executed by literal Nazis in Ukraine against breakaway provinces in the east are accompanied by a hypocritical silence from the West. Refugees streaming away from encircled and bombarded populated centers tell tales of mass murder, indiscriminate targeting of civilians, and even grisly accounts of forced organ harvesting taking place from the bodies of those killed by Kiev’s combined arms offensive, or from those kidnapped by criminal gangs operating in the vacuum of impunity afforded by the West’s silence.

Unlike in Libya, Syria, and now Iraq where the Western media eagerly reported “activist” accounts as unquestionable truth, and even participated in flagrant fabrications to justify further military intervention, particularly in Libya and Syria, networks like the BBC dismiss Ukrainian refugee accounts as hearsay not warranting any further investigation. In the BBC’s article, “The Ukrainian refugees escaping to Russia,” it states:

They claim that masses of Polish snipers have been shooting civilians, that children have been abducted and flown to America to have their organs removed, and that the Ukrainian army has been killing refugees who have been trying to escape.

There is no evidence to support any of these wild claims. But what they prove is a deep-seated mistrust of Kiev.[i]

What could be considered more “wild” is the BBC’s outrageous hypocrisy, their lack of investigating claims – considering they claim to be journalists – and their lack of explanation as to just why the people of eastern Ukraine harbor a “deep-seated mistrust of Kiev.” Why would thousands of eastern Ukrainians, hostile or distrusting of Kiev, flee their homes in the first place had Kiev not been carrying out a policy of criminal brutality?

Forced Organ Harvesting – Real Horror Deliberately Dismissed by the BBC

Russian sources tell a different story, explaining the details of the ongoing horror the BBC mentions in passing but failed to either qualify or dispel with anything resembling evidence. In Pravda’s article, “In Ukraine, human organs don’t stink,” it is reported that:

Shocking information appeared on the social networks saying that the militia from Slavyansk found hundreds of corpses of National Guard soldiers during a night reconnaissance operation. The soldiers had had their stomachs ripped open and internal organs removed. In addition, the people living in the troubled territories, have seen well-equipped ambulance vehicles, armored cash collection vans and other special vehicles near hospitals of the Ukrainian army.Employees of international airports, for example, in Boryspil, said that there were many small aircraft chartered to transport special refrigerators that are used for transporting human organs.

These would be the same “social networks” frequently cited by the Western media to substantiate claims made against the targeted governments of Libya and Syria. Now that Western interests are backing a regime trying to consolidate its power against armed fighters, such stories are “wild” and unworthy of further investigation. Pravda notes that the impoverished state of Ukraine’s military – unable to provide even matching uniforms or food – makes the increased medical presence around Kiev’s forces very unlikely the result of interest in preserving the well-being of both its own fighters as well as those caught in their path.

Instead, considering the immense corruption and lawlessness that existed even before the so-called “Euromaidan” and the rise of an ultra-right client regime operating in utter disarray, it is more likely organ harvesting for profit is taking place. Eastern Europe has been one of several global epicenters for forced organ harvesting for years. A November 2011 Bloomberg article titled, “Organ Gangs Force Poor to Sell Kidneys for Desperate Israelis,” reported that:

Investigators on five continents say they have uncovered intertwining criminal rings run by Israelis and eastern Europeans that move people across borders — sometimes against their will — to sell a kidney.

“The criminal here is the middleman who profits from the sick and the poor,” says Bahat, who investigated an organ- trafficking ring in Jerusalem. “It touches my heart that people will sell part of their body because they need money to live.”

Criminals see an opportunity to make big money in the organ trade, where they can sell a kidney for 15 to 20 times what they pay, police throughout Europe say.

“They recognize the obscene profit that can be made in the expanding black market in body parts,” says Jonathan Ratel, a Pristina, Kosovo-based prosecutor who has been investigating organ trafficking over the past two years. “It keeps happening because there is so much money in this.”

Traffickers typically pay $10,000 to a seller for a kidney and collect $150,000 when selling it to a patient.

In fact, amid the chaos of Ukraine’s armed conflict, it would be unthinkable that these same criminal gangs would not be scouring the battlefields and hospitals for potential victims. The BBC’s failure to investigate the very plausible claims of desperate refugees suggests both utter journalistic incompetence and even complicity in covering up atrocities being committed as part of Kiev’s brutal, unwarranted, and deadly bid to consolidate power.

The state of forced organ harvesting as described by Bloomberg in 2011 implicated criminal gangs in Ukraine specifically, as have other reports. Ukrainian hospitals and doctors have been long-implicated as well. How then does the BBC call accounts of organ harvesting “wild claims” when nothing has been done to stop such practices since 2011, and especially with conditions in Ukraine today setting the stage for such criminality to flourish unchecked?

History Repeating Itself 

Just as the ultra-right taking power in Kiev signifies the resurgence of Nazism in Europe, fully backed by the European Union and NATO, the covering up of forced organ harvesting and other horrors is torn straight from the playbook of Adolf Hitler’s Nazis, including the likes of the notorious Josef Mengele. History is repeating itself, specifically because of the ignorance of Western audiences and the complicity of journalists charged with reporting the truth who instead, bury it under propaganda.

Since organ harvesting is undoubtedly taking place in Ukraine today – since it was taking place on record before the conflict even began – the BBC’s dismissal of this tale of horror may mean Polish snipers supported by NATO may also be carrying out atrocities, and the regime of Petro Poroshenko may very well be carrying out campaigns of racially motivated genocide.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

http://journal-neo.org/2014/07/09/organ-harvesting-in-ukraine-go-unreported/

 

Reprinted in

http://www.globalresearch.ca/organ-harvesting-in-ukraine-goes-unreported/5390599
Organ Harvesting in Ukraine Goes Unreported, July 10, 2014

[i] http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27993547

The Ukrainian refugees escaping to Russia

The corporate annexation of Ukraine — “a gold mine of profits”

The Ecologist, March 21, 2014

As the US and EU apply sanctions on Russia over its annexation’ of Crimea, JP Sottile reveals the corporate annexation of Ukraine. For Cargill, Chevron, Monsanto, there’s a gold mine of profits to be made from agri-business and energy exploitation.

Ukraine – the corporate annexation

by JP Sottile

The potential here for agriculture / agribusiness is amazing … production here could double … Ukraine’s agriculture could be a real gold mine.

On 12th January 2014, a reported 50,000 “pro-Western” Ukrainians descended upon Kiev’s Independence Square to protest against the government of President Viktor Yanukovych.

Stoked in part by an attack on opposition leader Yuriy Lutsenko, the protest marked the beginning of the end of Yanukovych’s four year-long government.

That same day, the Financial Times reported a major deal for US agribusiness titan Cargill.

Business confidence never faltered

Despite the turmoil within Ukrainian politics after Yanukovych rejected a major trade deal with the European Union just seven weeks earlier, Cargill was confident enough about the future to fork over $200 million to buy a stake in Ukraine’s UkrLandFarming.

According to the Financial Times, UkrLandFarming is the world’s eighth-largest land cultivator and second biggest egg producer. And those aren’t the only eggs in Cargill’s increasingly ample basket.

On 13th December 2013, Cargill announced the purchase of a stake in a Black Sea grain terminal at Novorossiysk on Russia’s Black Sea coast.

The port – to the east of Russia’s strategically and historically important Crimean naval base – gives them a major entry-point to Russian markets and adds them to the list of Big Ag companies investing in ports around the Black Sea, both in Russia and Ukraine.

Cargill has been in Ukraine for over two decades, investing in grain elevators and acquiring a major Ukrainian animal feed company in 2011. And, based on its investment in UkrLandFarming, Cargill was decidedly confident amidst the post-EU deal chaos.

It’s a stark juxtaposition to the alarm bells ringing out from the US media, bellicose politicians on Capitol Hill and perplexed policymakers in the White House.

Instability – what instablility?

It’s even starker when compared to the anxiety expressed by Morgan Williams, President and CEO of the US-Ukraine Business Council – which, according to its website, has been “Promoting US-Ukraine business relations since 1995.”

Williams was interviewed by the International Business Times on March 13 and, despite Cargill’s demonstrated willingness to spend, he said, “The instability has forced businesses to just go about their daily business and not make future plans for investment, expansion and hiring more employees.”

In fact, Williams, who does double-duty as Director of Government Affairs at the private equity firm SigmaBleyzer, claimed, “Business plans have been at a standstill.”

Apparently, he wasn’t aware of Cargill’s investment, which is odd given the fact that he could’ve simply called Van A. Yeutter, Vice President for Corporate Affairs at Cargill, and asked him about his company’s quite active business plan.

There is little doubt Williams has the phone number because Mr. Yuetter serves on the Executive Committee of the selfsame US-Ukraine Business Council. It’s quite a cozy investment club, too.

According to his SigmaBleyzer profile, Williams “started his work regarding Ukraine in 1992” and has since advised American agribusinesses “investing in the former Soviet Union.” As an experienced fixer for Big Ag, he must be fairly friendly with the folks on the Executive Committee.

Big Ag luminaries – Monsanto, Eli Lilly, Dupont, John Deere …

And what a committee it is – it’s a veritable who’s who of Big Ag. Among the luminaries working tirelessly and no doubt selflessly for a better, freer Ukraine are:

  • Melissa Agustin, Director, International Government Affairs & Trade for Monsanto
  • Brigitte Dias Ferreira, Counsel, International Affairs for John Deere
  • Steven Nadherny, Director, Institutional Relations for agriculture equipment-maker CNH Industrial
  • Jeff Rowe, Regional Director for DuPont Pioneer
  • John F. Steele, Director, International Affairs for Eli Lilly & Company

And, of course, Cargill’s Van A. Yeutter. But Cargill isn’t alone in their warm feelings toward Ukraine. As Reuters reported in May 2013, Monsanto – the largest seed company in the world – plans to build a $140 million “non-GM (genetically modified) corn seed plant in Ukraine.”

And right after the decision on the EU trade deal, Jesus Madrazo, Monsanto’s Vice President for Corporate Engagement, reaffirmed his company’s “commitment to Ukraine” and “the importance of creating a favorable environment that encourages innovation and fosters the continued development of agriculture.”

Monsanto’s strategy includes a little “hearts and minds” public relations, too. On the heels of Mr. Madrazo’s reaffirmation, Monsanto announced “a social development program titled ‘Grain Basket of the Future’ to help rural villagers in the country improve their quality of life.”

The initiative will dole out grants of up to $25,000 to develop programs providing “educational opportunities, community empowerment, or small business development.”

Immense economic importance

The well-crafted moniker ‘Grain Basket of the Future’ is telling because, once upon a time, Ukraine was known as ‘the breadbasket’ of the Soviet Union. The CIA ranks Soviet-era Ukraine second only to Mother Russia as the “most economically important component of the former Soviet Union.”

In many ways, the farmland of Ukraine was the backbone of the USSR. Its fertile black soil generated over a quarter of the USSR’s agriculture. It exported substantial quantities of food to other republics and its farms generated four times the output of the next-ranking republic.

Although Ukraine’s agricultural output plummeted in the first decade after the break-up of the Soviet Union, the farming sector has been growing spectacularly in recent years.

While Europe struggled to shake-off the Great Recession, Ukraine’s agriculture sector grew 13.7% in 2013.

Ukraine’s agriculture economy is hot. Russia’s is not. Hampered by the effects of climate change and 25 million hectares of uncultivated agricultural land, Russia lags behind its former breadbasket.

According to the Centre for Eastern Studies, Ukraine’s agricultural exports rose from $4.3 billion in 2005 to $17.9 billion in 2012 and, harkening the heyday of the USSR, farming currently accounts for 25% of its total exports. Ukraine is also the world’s third-largest exporter of wheat and of corn. And corn is not just food. It is also ethanol.

Feeding Europe

But people gotta eat – particularly in Europe. As Frank Holmes of US Global Investors assessed in 2011, Ukraine is poised to become Europe’s butcher. Meat is difficult to ship, but Ukraine is perfectly located to satiate Europe’s hunger.

Just two days after Cargill bought into UkrLandFarming, Global Meat News reported a huge forecasted spike in “all kinds” of Ukrainian meat exports, with an increase of  8.1% overall and staggering 71.4% spike in pork exports.

No wonder Eli Lilly is represented on the US-Ukraine Business Council’s Executive Committee. Its Elanco Animal Health unit is a major manufacturer of feed supplements.

And it is also notable that Monsanto’s planned seed plant is non-GMO, perhaps anticipating an emerging GMO-unfriendly European market and Europe’s growing appetite for organic foods. When it comes to Big Ag’s profitable future in Europe, the stakes couldn’t be higher.

A long string of Russian losses

For Russia and its hampered farming economy, it’s another in a long string of losses to US encroachment – from NATO expansion into Eastern Europe to US military presence to its south and onto a major shale gas development deal recently signed by Chevron in Ukraine.

So, why was Big Ag so bullish on Ukraine, even in the face of so much uncertainty and the predictable reaction by Russia?

The answer is that the seeds of Ukraine’s turn from Russia have been sown for the last two decades by the persistent Cold War alliance between corporations and foreign policy. It’s a version of the ‘Deep State‘ that is usually associated with the oil and defense industries, but also exists in America’s other heavily subsidized industry – agriculture.

Morgan Williams is at the nexus of Big Ag’s alliance with US foreign policy. To wit, SigmaBleyzer touts Mr. Williams’ work with “various agencies of the US government, members of Congress, congressional committees, the Embassy of Ukraine to the US, international financial institutions, think tanks and other organizations on US-Ukraine business, trade, investment and economic development issues.”

Freedom – for US business

As President of the US-Ukraine Business Council, Williams has access to Council cohort – David Kramer, President of Freedom House. Officially a non-governmental organization, it has been linked with overt and covert ‘democracy’ efforts in places where the door isn’t open to American interests – aka US corporations.

Freedom House, the National Endowment for Democracy and National Democratic Institute helped fund and support the Ukrainian ‘Orange Revolution’ in 2004. Freedom House is funded directly by the US Government, the National Endowment for Democracy and the US Department of State.

David Kramer is a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs and, according to his Freedom House bio page, formerly a Senior Fellow at the Project for the New American Century.

Nuland’s $5 billion for Ukrainian ‘democracy’

That puts Kramer and, by one degree of separation, Big Ag fixer Morgan Williams in the company of PNAC co-founder Robert Kagan who, as coincidence would have it, is married to Victoria “F*ck the EU” Nuland, the current Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.

Interestingly enough, Ms. Nuland spoke to the US-Ukrainian Foundation last 13th December, extolling the virtues of the Euromaidan movement as the embodiment of “the principles and values that are the cornerstones for all free democracies.”

Nuland also told the group that the United States had invested more than $5 billion in support of Ukraine’s “European aspirations” – meaning pulling Ukraine away from Russia. She made her remarks on a dais featuring a backdrop emblazoned with a Chevron logo.

Also, her colleague and phone call buddy US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt helped Chevron cook up their 50-year shale gas deal right in Russia’s kitchen.

Coca-Cola, Exxon-Mobil, Raytheon

Although Chevron sponsored that event, it is not listed as a supporter of the Foundation. But the Foundation does list the Coca-Cola Company, ExxonMobil and Raytheon as major sponsors. And, to close the circle of influence, the US-Ukraine Business Council is also listed as a supporter.

Which brings the story back to Big Ag’s fixer – Morgan Williams.

Although he was glum about the current state of investment in Ukraine, he’s gotta wear shades when he looks into the future. He told the International Business Times:

“The potential here for agriculture / agribusiness is amazing … production here could double.  The world needs the food Ukraine could produce in the future. Ukraine’s agriculture could be a real gold mine.”

Of course, his priority is to ensure that the bread of well-connected businesses gets lavishly buttered in Russia’s former breadbasket. And there is no better connected group of Ukraine-interested corporations than American agribusiness.

Given the extent of US official involvement in Ukrainian politics – including the interesting fact that Ambassador Pyatt pledged US assistance to the new government in investigating and rooting-out corruption – Cargill’s seemingly risky investment strategy probably wasn’t that risky, after all.

 

J P Sottile is a freelance journalist, radio co-host, documentary filmmaker and former broadcast news producer in Washington, D.C. His weekly show, Inside the Headlines w/ The Newsvandal, co-hosted by James Moore, airs every Friday on KRUU-FM in Fairfield, Iowa. He blogs at Newsvandal.com.

Follow him on Twitter: @newsvandal

http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/2328765/ukraine_the_corporate_annexation.html

This article was first published on Consortium News

Corporate Interests Behind Ukraine Putsch

Air India pilots heard MH17 redirected over “hot” airspace by Ukrainian air traffic controller

Times of India:

Air India flight was 90 seconds away when missile struck Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17

Manju VManju V,TNN | Jul 20, 2014, 01.40 AM IST

Note: see website for  chart “How Direct Routing Proved Fatal”

MUMBAI: The ministry of civil aviation’s claim that there was no Air India flight near the ill-fated Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 when it was shot down over Ukraine on Thursday appears misleading.

An Air India Dreamliner flight going from Delhi to Birmingham was in fact less than 25km away from the Malaysian aircraft, a distance covered by a Dreamliner or Boeing 777 in about 90 seconds, when the latter was hit. Because of this closeness, the Dnipropetrovsk (local Ukrainian) air traffic controller asked the AI pilots to try and establish contact with pilots of the Malaysian aircraft who had stopped responding to its calls.

Minutes before the crash caused by a missile strike, the AI pilots had also heard the controller give the Malaysian aircraft MH17 what is called “a direct routing”. This permits an aircraft to fly straight, instead of tracking the regular route which is generally a zig-zag track that goes from one ground-based navigation aid or way point to another. “Direct routing saves fuel and time and is preferred by pilots. In this case, it proved fatal,” said an airline source. “The AI Dreamliner was less than 25km away from the Malaysian aircraft when the latter was hit by a missile. When the pilots learnt the cause of the crash later, they were stunned. It’s like the person standing next to you has been hit by a sniper bullet,” said the source. An Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner. (TOI file photo)

As instructed by the controller, the AI pilots tried to contact the Boeing 777 after its transponder display went off the radar. The message they sent was: “Malaysian 17, this is Air India 113. How do you read?” There was, of course, no response.

Soon after the tragedy, the media picked up data from flightradar24, a live flight tracker website which showed the AI aircraft in the vicinity. But the next day, on Friday, the civil aviation ministry issued a statement that “there was no Air India flight near the ill-fated Malaysian plane at the time of the incident”.

The Ukrainian airspace is divided into five flight information regions: Kiev, Lviv, Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa and Simferopol. MH17 was in the Dnipropetrovsk airspace flying an east-bound track on 33,000feet and the AI Delhi-Birmingham flight was on a west-bound route and had entered Ukraine after crossing Russia when the AI pilots heard the Dnipropetrovsk controller give the Malaysian aircraft a direct routing.

Barely minutes later, the AI pilots heard the controller trying to establish contact with the Malaysian aircraft. When no response came from the Malaysian crew, the controller asked the AI pilots to try. It is standard practice for air traffic controllers to ask pilots of aircraft in the vicinity to get in touch with pilots who have stopped responding. A part of the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 that crashed after being hit by a missile in eastern Ukraine. (Reuters photo)

In order to communicate, pilots and controllers tune in to one particular radio frequency, and all the conversation that takes place on that wavelength can be heard by all the aircraft who are tuned in to this frequency. So the pilots can hear each other as well as the instructions given by the controller to all the aircraft in a particular flight information region.

Other than this particular radio frequency on which pilots can communicate with controllers and other pilots, there is another radio set in the cockpit which is always tuned to 121.5MHz, known as the emergency frequency.

The pilots would try to contact the non-responding crew on this frequency too, but more importantly, it is on this frequency that they would get to hear the signature distress beep tone emitted by an emergency locator transmitter of an aircraft soon after it has crashed.

Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov’s official statement, Kremlin, Moscow : “They try to show to the whole world that we are responsible for the crash. It is very strange that without any evidence our colleagues from western media would like to find somebody who is responsible for the crash,” Antonov said. “It seems to me that this is part of information warfare which has been started against the Russian Federation and federation armed forces.” “As for me, I don’t want to use this opportunity to blame anybody. I would just like to raise few questions for my colleagues from the armed forces of Ukraine,” Antonov said. “I hope they try to answer the questions, it will be a good opportunity for us to realize where we are, whether there is a possibility for us to restart cooperation and to find who is really responsible for the tragedy.” “Answers for these questions could help us find an opportunity to prevent such tragedies in the future,” the Deputy Defense Minister said.

Source:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Air-India-flight-was-90-seconds-away-when-missile-struck-Malaysia-Airlines-Flight-MH17/articleshow/38702536.cms