How Can We Take On the Military-Industrial Complex?

From LA Progressive

Nov. 20, 2022
By William Astore

Stop trying to dominate the world. Stop claiming that democracy can be spread by bullets and bombs.

To dream the impossible dream/To fight the unbeatable foe/To bear with unbearable sorrow/To run where the brave dare not go …

Whether you call it the military-industrial complex (MIC), the national security state, the MICIMATT,1 the blob, or something else entirely, taking on the MIC and trying to restrain its influence and power is akin to dreaming the impossible dream.

President Eisenhower warned us about the grave threat posed to liberty and democracy by the MIC in 1961. In the early 1980s, as a college student, I wrote against the growth of the MIC and massive Pentagon spending under President Ronald Reagan. After I retired from the military, I started writing articles, giving interviews, etc. against the MIC and militarism in America. I’ve been doing it for fifteen years, and it hasn’t made any discernible difference. Why should it?

The MIC is massive and massively powerful. It consumes more than half of the federal discretionary budget. It employs millions of people. It is wildly profitable for major military contractors like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon. It is sold as essential to America’s national security and safety. Its uniformed members are lauded as heroes. We are all as Americans immersed in a matrix of militarism and imperialism since birth; to fight against it, then, is often seen as un-American.

Spoiler alert: I have no easy answers. There are no silver bullets. Ike called for an alert and knowledgable citizenry (that’s us) who would act as guards against the growing anti-democratic power of the MIC. The MIC responded by making sure we are kept largely docile and ignorant of its plans and actions.

When brave Americans do speak up, they are punished. Not people like me—I’m small fry. I mean people like Martin Luther King Jr., who called America the world’s greatest purveyor of violence during the Vietnam War. That speech made him unpopular even among many of his followers; exactly one year later, he was shot and killed.

People who truly pose a threat to the MIC are taught a lesson. Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, at the time also a major in the Hawaii Army National Guard, was smeared by NBC News as a Russian asset when she announced her candidacy for president in 2020. Gabbard was the only mainstream candidate criticizing the MIC and its disastrous regime-change wars. Dennis Kucinich, who bravely advocated for a Department of Peace, was sidelined and silenced by his own party (the Democrats). Jill Stein, who ran in 2016 as the Green Party candidate for the presidency, was also smeared as a “useful idiot” for Russia because she called for major reductions to war budgets.

There are many examples of brave Americans fighting the MIC. Edward Snowden told the truth about abuses of power by U.S. intelligence agencies; he’s in exile in Russia. Chelsea Manning went to prison for bravely exposing war crimes in Iraq. Daniel Hale is in prison for exposing the murderous results of America’s drone wars. Even foreign journalists like Julian Assange aren’t safe. Assange embarrassed the MIC and partially exposed the hideous face of war to Americans, and for that he’s being held in a maximum security prison under conditions meant to break him physically and mentally.

What is to be done? It’s flattering to me that a few readers think I might have answers. I have none. I’m not an organizer, I’m not an agitator or protester, I’m just a retired military schmuck looking for a new way forward for our country (and, by extension, for the planet). A new cold war is not a new way forward. Indeed, a new cold war will only ensure a hotter future for us all, if not an irradiated one.

I think George McGovern had the right approach in 1972. “Come home, America,” McGovern said. Stop trying to dominate the world. Stop claiming that democracy can be spread by bullets and bombs. Downsize the military and the whole MICIMATT and with the money saved send a check to every American. Call it a true peace dividend.

Support our troops—bring them home, is a commonsense message that holds appeal. Returning to Eisenhower, Ike once said that only Americans can truly hurt America. We hurt America when we exaggerate threats overseas, when we give blank checks to warmongers, indeed when we forget how hellish war truly is and how corrosive it is to our democracy (what’s left of it) and our way of life.

I’ve written so much about this that I know I’m repeating myself. And I’m probably preaching to the choir as well. But the choir must keep singing, even when the dogs of war howl to drown us out.

merica needs a reformation or a revolution. A restoration of liberty where war and militarism are seen as the antithesis of liberty. Why can’t America be a shining city on a hill? Why do we instead choose to be a dark fortress bristling with cannons?

To dream the impossible dream/to fight the unbeatable foe …

1Military-industrial-congressional-intelligence-media-academia-think tank complex. An awkward acronym that does help to capture the size and reach of the national security state. The MIC itself is supported by the mainstream media, many colleges and universities that are funded by the DoD, and all those think tanks in the DC area that are often funded by major weapons makers. 

https://www.laprogressive.com/war-and-peace/take-on-the-military-industrial-complex

それは数日の問題だ」:イスラエルがガザに爆弾を降らせる中、パレスチナ人は別れを告げる

ソーシャルメディアに投稿したパレスチナ人は、イスラエルによる血なまぐさい爆撃を生き延びるとは思えないと言っています。
ソース:https://www.middleeasteye.net/…/we-wont-make-it-time...
ポーリン・エルテル記者
公開日:2025年4月4日 16:37 BST | 最終更新: 1 日 11 時間前

パレスチナ人は、イスラエルによるガザ地区への激しい爆撃の中で生き残れないという恐怖を表明し、最後のメッセージと別れの手紙をソーシャルメディアに投稿しています。
ガザの多くのパレスチナ人は、2023年10月にイスラエルの猛攻撃が始まって以来、ソーシャルメディアに目を向けて、互いにコミュニケーションを取り、イスラエルの攻撃と日常の経験を記録し、彼らの考え、希望、生活を国際的な聴衆と共有しています。メディア、ソーシャルメディアプラットフォーム、芸術および教育機関が、戦争に関連する情報を検閲し、表現の自由を黙認していると非難されています。

しかし、過去24時間の間に、攻撃の深刻さと破壊力の中で絶望を表明し、ガザの人々が今回生き残れないかもしれないという懸念を表明する投稿が急増しました。
木曜日、イスラエルは少なくとも112人のパレスチナ人を殺害しました。この日は、イスラエルが3月18日に包囲された飛び地で戦争を再開して以来、最も致命的な日になりました。

ガザ出身の女性ヌールが投稿したビデオは、完全に破壊された近所の中にある近くの建物に対するイスラエルの攻撃が、女性がバックグラウンドですすり泣きながらいる様子を示しています。

「今回は生き残れないようです..」というキャプションには書かれています。

Deir al-Balahのサッカージャーナリスト、Abubaker Amedは、ガザの人々は「世界が彼らを失望させたことを知っており、したがって彼らの殺害は時間の問題だと感じている」と投稿で表明した。

何人かのユーザーはまた、イスラエルによる食料と必需品の封鎖による飢餓に直面しているガザの人々だけでなく、ガザの人々のために注意を払い、声を上げるよう、人々と世界の大国に呼びかけました。

「上は爆弾、下は飢え-ガザは苦しんでいる。いつまでこれを耐えられるだろうか?」あるパレスチナ人が書いた。「世界は今すぐ行動しなければならない!」
イスラエルのガザ戦争は、同盟国、特に米国によって支援され、資金提供され続けています。

3月、ドナルド・トランプ政権は、イスラエルへの約30億ドルの武器販売を承認するために、通常の議会審査を迂回しました。

木曜日、無所属の米国上院議員バーニー・サンダースは、トランプ政権によってすでに承認されているイスラエルへの88億ドル相当の攻撃兵器販売を阻止するために、2つの共同不承認決議案を提出しようとしました。

ティム・ケインと元大統領候補のエリザベス・ウォーレンを含む15人の上院議員だけが賛成票を投じ、武器移転を阻止する投票は失敗に終わりました。

祈りと自己賛辞
何人かのユーザーは、彼らが死ぬ場合に備えて、彼らのソーシャルメディアアカウントを使って別れのメッセージや祈りを投稿しています。
ガザの作家で薬剤師のオマール・ハマドは、木曜日の夜、Xに別れのメッセージを投稿し、彼の投稿は違いを生んでいないと感じたと述べた。
「最初は、自分の手が書けるものすべてを共有することに熱心でした」と彼は言いました。「しかし、あなたが起こっているすべてのことに対して最終的に立ち上がるために、あなたが何を見たり読んだりする必要があるのかわかりません。私たちのためではなく、あなたの良心のため、あなたの信仰のために、あなたが眠りにつくときにあなたの良心と闘わないように。」

ハマドは4月3日の別の投稿で、「最近のジェノサイド全体を通して、死がこれほど身近に引き寄せられたと感じたことはありません」と書いています。

ヨーロッパ病院とアルアクサ病院の医師であるハムザ・アルシャリフは、Xに「ストリップのすべての地域で爆撃が激化している」と投稿し、「血がいたるところにある」と述べた。

「もし私が死んだら、私は数字ではなく、それ自体が惑星であり、達成したい夢と野心を持っています。祈りの中で私のことを忘れないで、私のことを話し続けてください」とアルシャリフ博士は3月18日から彼のプロフィールにピン留めされた投稿に書いています。

先月、イスラエルのミサイルは、パレスチナ・トゥデイの特派員であるモハマド・マンスールが自宅を標的にしたイスラエルの空爆で殺害されたわずか数時間後に、ベイト・ラヒヤで23歳のアルジャジーラジャーナリストのホサム・シャバットを標的にして殺害した。彼の妻と息子は彼と一緒に殺された。

ホッサムの死の数時間後、彼の同僚はホッサム自身が書いたメッセージを投稿し、彼が標的にされる可能性が高いという感覚を持っていたことを示した。

「あなたがこれを読んでいるなら、それは私がイスラエルの占領軍によって殺されたことを意味します-おそらく標的にされました」と23歳は言いました。

ホッサムの自筆の弔辞は、昨年12月にイスラエルの空爆で死亡し、広く流通した詩「If I must die」がイスラエルの戦争の中で希望と抵抗の象徴となった有名なパレスチナの詩人で学者のRefaat Alareerを彷彿とさせます。

‘It’s only a matter of days’: Palestinians bid farewell as Israel rains bombs on Gaza; ‘It seems we won’t survive this time.’

From Middle East Eye
April 4, 2025
By Pauline Ertel

Palestinians posting on social media say they don’t think they will survive Israel’s bloody bombardment across the strip

Palestinians are posting final messages and letters of farewell on social media, expressing their fear they will not survive amid the intensity of Israel‘s carpet bombing of the Gaza Strip.

Many Palestinians in Gaza have turned to social media since the start of Israel’s onslaught in October 2023 to communicate with one another, document Israeli attacks and their daily experiences, and share their thoughts, hopes and lives with international audiences in a period when media outletssocial media platforms and arts and education institutions stand accused of censoring information and muzzling freedom of expression related to the war.

Over the past 24 hours however, posts expressing hopelessness amid the severity and destructiveness of the attacks and fear that people in Gaza might not survive this time, have soared. 

On Thursday, Israel killed at least 112 Palestinians, in what has become the deadliest day since Israel resumed its war on the besieged enclave on 18 March.

video posted by Nour, a woman from Gaza, shows an Israeli strike on a building nearby amidst an entirely destroyed neighbourhood as a woman sobs in the background.

“It seems we won’t survive this time ..” the caption reads.

Journalist Abdallah Alattar from Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, shared: “it seems that we won’t make it this time” on Friday morning, which has been widely circulated and reshared.

Abubaker Amed, a football journalist from Deir al-Balah, expressed in a post that the people of Gaza “know the world has let them down and thus feel their killing is a matter of time”.

Several users have also called on the people and global powers to pay attention and speak up for the people in Gaza, facing not only bombing, but also starvation due to Israel’s blockade on food and essentials.

“Bombs above, hunger below—Gaza is suffering. How much longer can we endure this?” wrote one Palestinian. “The world must act NOW!”

Israel’s war on Gaza continues to be supported and funded by its allies, most notably the US.  

In March, the Donald Trump administration bypassed a normal congressional review to approve a nearly $3bn arms sale to Israel.

On Thursday, independent US Senator Bernie Sanders attempted to bring forward two joint resolutions of disapproval to block $8.8bn worth of offensive weapons sales to Israel that were already approved by the Trump administration.

Only 15 senators, including Tim Kaine and former presidential hopeful Elizabeth Warren, voted to move forward and the vote to block the weapons transfers failed.

Prayers and self-eulogies

Several users have also used their social media accounts to post a farewell messages and prayers in case they should die.  

Writer and pharmacist from Gaza Omar Hamad, on Thursday night posted a farewell message on X, saying that he felt his posts did not make a difference.

“At first, I was eager, sharing everything my hands could write,” he said. “But I do not know what you need to see or read to finally rise against all that is happening – not for our sake, but for your conscience, for your faith, so that you do not struggle with your conscience when you go to sleep.”

I have never felt death drawing this close to me throughout the entire genocide as I do these days,” Hamad wrote in a separate post on 3 April.

Hamza Alsharif, a medical doctor at the European Hospital and the Al-Aqsa Hospital posted on X that bombings “are intensifying across all areas of the Strip”, and that “blood is everywhere”.

“If I die, I am not a number, I am a planet in itself, I have dreams and ambitions that I wanted to achieve. Don’t forget me in your prayers and keep talking about me,” Dr Alsharif wrote in a post pinned to his profile since 18 March.

Last month, an Israeli missile targeted and killed 23-year-old Al Jazeera journalist Hossam Shabat in Beit Lahiya just hours after Mohammad Mansour, a correspondent for Palestine Today, was killed in an Israeli air strike which targeted his home. His wife and son were killed alongside him.

Hours after Hossam’s death, his colleagues posted a message written by Hossam himself, indicating that he had a sense that he would be likely targeted.

“If you’re reading this, it means I have been killed – most likely targeted – by the Israeli occupation forces,” said the 23-year-old.

Hossam’s self-written eulogy was reminiscent of renowned Palestinian poet and academic Refaat Alareer, who was killed in an Israeli air strike in December last year and whose widely circulated poem ‘If I must die‘ became a symbol of hope and resistance amid Israel’s war.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/trending/we-wont-make-it-time-people-gaza-post-farewell-messages-online

John Pilger’s 2014 Warning About Ukraine

Originally published by The Guardian, May 13, 2014
In Ukraine, the US is dragging us towards war with Russia
Washington’s role in Ukraine, and its backing for the regime’s neo-Nazis, has huge implications for the rest of the world
By John Pilger

Republished by Consortium News, September 24, 2022

In an article on May 13, 2014 in The Guardian, republished here, John Pilger warned the “U.S. is threatening to take the world to war” over Ukraine, words that have taken on new meaning.

Why do we tolerate the threat of another world war in our name? Why do we allow lies that justify this risk? The scale of our indoctrination, wrote Harold Pinter, is a “brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis”, as if the truth “never happened even while it was happening”.

Every year the American historian William Blum publishes his “updated summary of the record of U.S. foreign policy” which shows that, since 1945, the U.S. has tried to overthrow more than 50 governments, many of them democratically elected; grossly interfered in elections in 30 countries; bombed the civilian populations of 30 countries; used chemical and biological weapons; and attempted to assassinate foreign leaders.

In many cases Britain has been a collaborator. The degree of human suffering, let alone criminality, is little acknowledged in the west, despite the presence of the world’s most advanced communications and nominally most free journalism. That the most numerous victims of terrorism – “our” terrorism – are Muslims, is unsayable. That extreme jihadism, which led to 9/11, was nurtured as a weapon of Anglo-American policy (Operation Cyclone in Afghanistan) is suppressed. In April the U.S. state department noted that, following Nato’s campaign in 2011, “Libya has become a terrorist safe haven“.

The name of “our” enemy has changed over the years, from communism to Islamism, but generally it is any society independent of western power and occupying strategically useful or resource-rich territory, or merely offering an alternative to U.S. domination.

The leaders of these obstructive nations are usually violently shoved aside, such as the democrats Muhammad Mossedeq in Iran, Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala and Salvador Allende in Chile, or they are murdered like Patrice Lumumba in the Democratic Republic of Congo. All are subjected to a western media campaign of vilification – think Fidel Castro, Hugo Chávez, now Vladimir Putin.

“If Putin can be provoked into coming to their aid, his pre-ordained ‘pariah’ role will justify a Nato-run guerrilla war that is likely to spill into Russia itself.”

Washington’s role in Ukraine is different only in its implications for the rest of us. For the first time since the Reagan years, the U.S. is threatening to take the world to war. With eastern Europe and the Balkans now military outposts of Nato, the last “buffer state” bordering Russia – Ukraine – is being torn apart by fascist forces unleashed by the U.S. and the EU. We in the west are now backing neo-Nazis in a country where Ukrainian Nazis backed Hitler.

Having masterminded the coup in February against the democratically elected government in Kiev, Washington’s planned seizure of Russia’s historic, legitimate warm-water naval base in Crimea failed. The Russians defended themselves, as they have done against every threat and invasion from the west for almost a century.

But Nato’s military encirclement has accelerated, along with U.S.-orchestrated attacks on ethnic Russians in Ukraine. If Putin can be provoked into coming to their aid, his pre-ordained “pariah” role will justify a Nato-run guerrilla war that is likely to spill into Russia itself.

Instead, Putin has confounded the war party by seeking an accommodation with Washington and the EU, by withdrawing Russian troops from the Ukrainian border and urging ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine to abandon the weekend’s provocative referendum.

These Russian-speaking and bilingual people – a third of Ukraine’s population – have long sought a democratic federation that reflects the country’s ethnic diversity and is both autonomous of Kiev and independent of Moscow. Most are neither “separatists” nor “rebels”, as the western media calls them, but citizens who want to live securely in their homeland.

Like the ruins of Iraq and Afghanistan, Ukraine has been turned into a C.I.A. theme park – run personally by C.I.A. director John Brennan in Kiev, with dozens of “special units” from the C.I.A. and F.B.I. setting up a “security structure” that oversees savage attacks on those who opposed the February coup. Watch the videos, read the eye-witness reports from the massacre in Odessa this month. Bussed fascist thugs burned the trade union headquarters, killing 41 people trapped inside. Watch the police standing by.

A doctor described trying to rescue people, “but I was stopped by pro-Ukrainian Nazi radicals. One of them pushed me away rudely, promising that soon me and other Jews of Odessa are going to meet the same fate. What occurred yesterday didn’t even take place during the fascist occupation in my town in world war two. I wonder, why the whole world is keeping silent.” [see footnote]

Russian-speaking Ukrainians are fighting for survival. When Putin announced the withdrawal of Russian troops from the border, the Kiev junta’s defence secretary, Andriy Parubiy – a founding member of the fascist Svoboda party – boasted that attacks on “insurgents” would continue. In Orwellian style, propaganda in the west has inverted this to Moscow “trying to orchestrate conflict and provocation“, according to William Hague. His cynicism is matched by Obama’s grotesque congratulations to the coup junta on its “remarkable restraint” after the Odessa massacre. The junta, says Obama, is “duly elected”. As Henry Kissinger once said: “It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but what is perceived to be true.”

In the U.S. media the Odessa atrocity has been played down as “murky” and a “tragedy” in which “nationalists” (neo-Nazis) attacked “separatists” (people collecting signatures for a referendum on a federal Ukraine). Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal damned the victims – “Deadly Ukraine Fire Likely Sparked by Rebels, Government Says“. Propaganda in Germany has been pure cold war, with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung warning its readers of Russia’s “undeclared war”. For the Germans, it is a poignant irony that Putin is the only leader to condemn the rise of fascism in 21st-century Europe.

A popular truism is that “the world changed” following 9/11. But what has changed? According to the great whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, a silent coup has taken place in Washington and rampant militarism now rules. The Pentagon currently runs “special operations” – secret wars – in 124 countries. At home, rising poverty and a loss of liberty are the historic corollary of a perpetual war state. Add the risk of nuclear war, and the question is: why do we tolerate this?_______________

FOOTNOTE: The Guardian attached the following footnote to Pilger’s story, which Pilger says suggests “that a quote of a witness to the Odessa atrocity is unverified. This appeared only in the last edition. In fact, the quote didn’t come from a Facebook entry, but from a Voice of America broadcast and was verified.” This is The Guardian‘s footnote: ” The following footnote was appended on 16 May 2014: The quotation from a doctor who says he was ‘stopped by pro-Ukrainian Nazi radicals’ was from an account on a Facebook page that has subsequently been removed.”

John Pilger has twice won Britain’s highest award for journalism and has been International Reporter of the Year, News Reporter of the Year and Descriptive Writer of the Year. He has made 61 documentary films and has won an Emmy, a BAFTA and the Royal Television Society prize. His ‘Cambodia Year Zero’ is named as one of the ten most important films of the 20th century. He can be contacted at www.johnpilger.com

[John Pilger died December 30, 2023]

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

https://consortiumnews.com/2022/09/24/john-pilgers-2014-warning-about-ukraine/

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/13/ukraine-us-war-russia-john-pilger