1,000s Turkish forces surround NATO’s Incirlik air base for ‘inspection’ amid rumors of coup attempt

From RT

July 30, 2016

Some 7,000 armed police in heavy vehicles surrounded the Incirlik air base used by NATO forces in Adana in what a Turkish minister called a “security check.” With no official explanation, speculations have arisen about a new coup attempt or VIP visit.

READ MORE: Anti-US rally staged at NATO Incirlik air base in Turkey (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

Hurriyet reported earlier that Adana police had been tipped off about a new coup attempt, and forces were immediately alerted. The entrance to the base was closed off.

Security forces armed with rifles and armored TOMA vehicles used by Turkish riot police could be seen at the site in photos taken by witnesses.

Turkey’s minister for EU Affairs downplayed the situation in a Twitter post, saying a “security inspection” was carried out.

“We did the general security check. There is nothing wrong,” he tweeted from Adana.

Some supporters of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan have reportedly flocked to the cordon surrounding the base. The scene, however, did not appear as massive and tense as the recent Adana protests demanding for the base to be shut down.

On Thursday, a huge rally marched towards the NATO base, as people with loudspeakers chanted anti-American and anti-Israel slogans. The demonstrators claim that the US had a hand in the failed July 15 coup attempt in which 270 people died. Tens of thousands people, including members of the military, police, judiciary, media, and civil service, have been arrested in connection with the coup, which Turkish officials say was organized by US-based cleric Fethullah Gulen, Erdogan’s former ally, who is now his most hated rival.

READ MORE: Anti-US rally staged at NATO Incirlik air base in Turkey (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

In the wake of the coup attempt, several military officials at the Incirlik Air Base, including its commander, General Bekir Ercan Van, were arrested on treason charges by Turkish authorities, which claimed that one of the rogue F-16 planes taking part in the rebellion to overthrow Erdogan’s government had been refueled there.

The general had even reportedly attempted to seek asylum in the US, but his plea was apparently rejected.

Incirlic Air Base is used by both the Turkish and US militaries and is vital to the US-led anti-terror bombing campaign in Syria and Iraq. It also serves as one of six NATO storage sites for US tactical nuclear weapons in Europe. The exact number of nuclear bombs kept at the base is unknown, although, according to various estimates, it may store up to 90 warheads.

The US-led coalition’s airstrikes had to be halted for several days when power was cut at the base. US military personnel stationed there had to switch to an internal power supply.

READ MORE: Local authorities block access to air base in Turkey that houses US nukes

The “inspection” at the base comes as the Turkish government announced a sweeping military reform on Saturday. In an interview with TV broadcaster A-Haber, Erdogan unveiled plans to scrap all military academies and replace them with a new national defense university.

The commanders of the different branches of the Turkish armed forces are to be put under the defense minister’s chain of command. In addition, Erdogan wants the National Intelligence Organization (MIT) and military chief of staff to report directly to him, which would require a new constitutional amendment to be passed by the parliament.

It also comes on the eve of a visit from a top US military official, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Dunford, who is scheduled to arrive in Turkey on Sunday. Diplomatic sources quoted by Hurriyet claim Dunford will go visit both Ankara and Incirlik.

https://www.rt.com/news/354042-turkish-police-incirlik-nato-coup/

The power of “Nyet”. The US decides what it wants Russia to do. Russia says “Nyet”

Global Research, July 28, 2016
Cluborlov 26 July 2016

The way things are supposed to work on this planet is like this: in the United States, the power structures (public and private) decide what they want the rest of the world to do. They communicate their wishes through official and unofficial channels, expecting automatic cooperation. If cooperation is not immediately forthcoming, they apply political, financial and economic pressure. If that still doesn’t produce the intended effect, they attempt regime change through a color revolution or a military coup, or organize and finance an insurgency leading to terrorist attacks and civil war in the recalcitrant nation. If that still doesn’t work, they bomb the country back to the stone age. This is the way it worked in the 1990s and the 2000s, but as of late a new dynamic has emerged.

In the beginning it was centered on Russia, but the phenomenon has since spread around the world and is about to engulf the United States itself. It works like this: the United States decides what it wants Russia to do and communicates its wishes, expecting automatic cooperation. Russia says “Nyet.” The United States then runs through all of the above steps up to but not including the bombing campaign, from which it is deterred by Russia’s nuclear deterrent. The answer remains “Nyet.” One could perhaps imagine that some smart person within the US power structure would pipe up and say: “Based on the evidence before us, dictating our terms to Russia doesn’t work; let’s try negotiating with Russia in good faith as equals.” And then everybody else would slap their heads and say, “Wow! That’s brilliant! Why didn’t we think of that?” But instead that person would be fired that very same day because, you see, American global hegemony is nonnegotiable. And so what happens instead is that the Americans act baffled, regroup and try again, making for quite an amusing spectacle.

The whole Edward Snowden imbroglio was particularly fun to watch. The US demanded his extradition. The Russians said: “Nyet, our constitution forbids it.” And then, hilariously, some voices in the West demanded in response that Russia change its constitution! The response, requiring no translation, was “Xa-xa-xa-xa-xa!” Less funny is the impasse over Syria: the Americans have been continuously demanding that Russia go along with their plan to overthrow Bashar Assad. The unchanging Russian response has been: “Nyet, the Syrians get to decide on their leadership, not Russia, and not the US.” Each time they hear it, the Americans scratch their heads and… try again. John Kerry was just recently in Moscow, holding a marathon “negotiating session” with Putin and Lavrov. Above is a photo of Kerry talking to Putin and Lavrov in Moscow a week or so ago and their facial expressions are hard to misread. There’s Kerry, with his back to the camera, babbling away as per usual. Lavrov’s face says: “I can’t believe I have to sit here and listen to this nonsense again.” Putin’s face says: “Oh the poor idiot, he can’t bring himself to understand that we’re just going to say ‘nyet’ again.” Kerry flew home with yet another “nyet.”

What’s worse, other countries are now getting into the act. The Americans told the Brits exactly how to vote, and yet the Brits said “nyet” and voted for Brexit. The Americans told the Europeans to accept the horrendous corporate power grab that is the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and the French said “nyet, it shall not pass.” The US organized yet another military coup in Turkey to replace Erdoǧan with somebody who won’t try to play nice with Russia, and the Turks said “nyet” to that too. And now, horror of horrors, there is Donald Trump saying “nyet” to all sorts of things—NATO, offshoring American jobs, letting in a flood of migrants, globalization, weapons for Ukrainian Nazis, free trade…

The corrosive psychological effect of “nyet” on the American hegemonic psyche cannot be underestimated. If you are supposed to think and act like a hegemon, but only the thinking part still works, then the result is cognitive dissonance. If your job is to bully nations around, and the nations can no longer be bullied, then your job becomes a joke, and you turn into a mental patient. The resulting madness has recently produced quite an interesting symptom: some number of US State Department staffers signed a letter, which was promptly leaked, calling for a bombing campaign against Syria in order to overthrow Bashar Assad. These are diplomats. Diplomacy is the art of avoiding war by talking. Diplomats who call for war are not being exactly… diplomatic. You could say that they are incompetent diplomats, but that wouldn’t go far enough (most of the competent diplomats left the service during the second Bush administration, many of them in disgust over having to lie about the rationale for the Iraq war). The truth is, they are sick, deranged non-diplomatic warmongers. Such is the power of this one simple Russian word that they have quite literally lost their minds.

But it would be unfair to single out the State Department. It is as if the entire American body politic has been infected by a putrid miasma. It permeates all things and makes life miserable. In spite of the mounting problems, most other things in the US are still somewhat manageable, but this one thing—the draining away of the ability to bully the whole world—ruins everything. It’s mid-summer, the nation is at the beach. The beach blanket is moth-eaten and threadbare, the beach umbrella has holes in it, the soft drinks in the cooler are laced with nasty chemicals and the summer reading is boring… and then there is a dead whale decomposing nearby, whose name is “Nyet.” It just ruins the whole ambiance!

The media chattering heads and the establishment politicos are at this point painfully aware of this problem, and their predictable reaction is to blame it on what they perceive as its ultimate source: Russia, conveniently personified by Putin. “If you aren’t voting for Clinton, you are voting for Putin” is one recently minted political trope. Another is that Trump is Putin’s agent. Any public figure that declines to take a pro-establishment stance is automatically labeled “Putin’s useful idiot.” Taken at face value, such claims are preposterous. But there is a deeper explanation for them: what ties them all together is the power of “nyet.” A vote for Sanders is a “nyet” vote: the Democratic establishment produced a candidate and told people to vote for her, and most of the young people said “nyet.” Same thing with Trump: the Republican establishment trotted out its Seven Dwarfs and told people to vote for any one of them, and yet most of the disenfranchised working-class white people said “nyet” and voted for Snow White the outsider.

It is a hopeful sign that people throughout the Washington-dominated world are discovering the power of “nyet.” The establishment may still look spiffy on the outside, but under the shiny new paint there hides a rotten hull, with water coming in though every open seam. A sufficiently resounding “nyet” will probably be enough to cause it to founder, suddenly making room for some very necessary changes. When that happens, please remember to thank Russia… or, if you insist, Putin.

[O poder do “não”]

Donbass: un primo (parziale) bilancio sulla guerra civile

Opinione Pubblica

Luglio ha visto visto impennarsi il numero della vittime del governo di Kiev

Questo luglio le attività militari dell’esercito ucraino nel Donbass hanno raggiunto il picco. Il numero di attacchi sul territorio del Donbass ammonta a centinaia al giorno. Difficilmente passa giorno senza che civili residenti nelle Repubbliche Popolari di Donetsk e Lugansk (DNR e LNR) cadano sotto gli attacchi ucraini, e che case ed infrastrutture delle città vengano distrutte. Ogni giorno, i rappresentanti delle Repubbliche del Donbass registrano l’arrivo di armi pesanti ucraine sul confine, vietate dall’accordo di Minsk.
Al vertice della NATO a Varsavia è stata osservata la violazione della tregua da entrambe le parti, ma la NATO ha dovuto ammettere la responsabilità ucraina.
Il 6 luglio, il vice Ministro degli Esteri russo, Karasin, ha incontrato gli ambasciatori di Francia e Germania in Russia, e ha espresso preoccupazione per la situazione nel Donbass per via delle azioni pericolose dell’Ucraina. In un comunicato che Karasin ha rilasciato dopo l’incontro, è stato affermato apertamente che le autorità di Kiev si stanno preparando a riprendere la guerra nel Donbass. Lo stesso giorno, su iniziativa del presidente Putin, si è tenuto un colloquio telefonico tra il leader russo ed il presidente Obama. Uno dei temi principali del colloquio è stata proprio la situazione nel Donbass.
Gli USA rifiutano, tuttavia, di fare pressione su Kiev e di forzare il governo ucraino a sottostare agli accordi di Minsk. In occasione del vertice NATO, la Russia è stata accusata di aggressione contro l’Ucraina in Crimea e nel Donbass, e al governo di Kiev sono stati promessi aiuti militari statunitensi per il valore di 500 milioni di dollari.
Inoltre, è stata istituita una commissione G5 + Ucraina per sostituire il procedimento “formato Normandia” per la soluzione del conflitto in Donbas. La Russia è esclusa dalle trattative di negoziazione per il Donbass, ma continua ad essere ritenuta responsabile per la realizzazione degli accordi di Minsk.
La Russia si troverebbe quindi ad affrontare un ulteriore isolamento, oltre che la pressione militare e politica della NATO, mentre le Repubbliche del Donbass devono affrontare i nuovi bombardamenti.
Secondo i rappresentanti del DNI locale, la situazione dell’estate 2016 nel Donbass ricorda le settimane più buie dell’estate del 2014. L’artiglieria ucraina in questo periodo sta bombardando le città del territorio, tra cui Donetsk, città di un milione di persone. L’Ucraina ha concentrato quasi tutte le unità disponibili del suo equipaggiamento militare sulla linea di demarcazione con le Repubbliche di Donetsk e Lugansk — oltre alle truppe, anche i lanciarazzi “Grad”, che si trovavano in origine vicino a Chernobyl. Si tratta di un meccanismo radioattivo, e perciò pericoloso per la salute dell’equipaggio.
Secondo i rappresentanti del DNI locale, tutto questo verrebbe svolto al fine di mettere in atto una “blitzkrieg”: la sconfitta delle Repubbliche del Donbass in una battaglia rapida.
Al momento, la popolazione di Donetsk ammonta a circa ¾ rispetto al numero degli abitanti prima della guerra, ed i bombardamenti continuano. Kiev sembrerebbe condurre la politica della terra bruciata nel Donbass, zona dissidente al governo, anche al fine di minare il morale dei cittadini locali.
Pertanto, la Russia si vedrebbe costretta a proteggere la popolazione del Donbass con qualsiasi mezzo, compresi mezzi militari. Ma finora sono ancora in corso i mezzi diplomatici. Il 13 luglio, il presidente Putin ha tenuto colloqui telefonici con Angela Merkel e François Hollande, e ancora una volta ha espresso profonda preoccupazione per i pesanti bombardamenti ucraini sul Donbass.

Silvia Vittoria Missotti